School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2670-80. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0108.
We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments.
我们需要为保护设定优先事项,因为我们不能在同一时间、同一地点做所有事情。我们以一种具有成本效益且时空明确的方式,为世界上受到威胁的哺乳动物确定了减少威胁行动的投资优先领域。我们的分析首次在全球范围内针对哺乳动物进行了精细分辨率的优先排序分析,考虑了栖息地丧失的风险、减轻这种风险所需的行动、这些行动的成本以及投资成功的可能性。我们使用各国过去立法有效性的频率和持续时间的信息来评估投资成功的可能性。建立新的保护区是获得最多投资的行动,而恢复行动则从未被选中。分析的分辨率和成功可能性的纳入对这一结果影响不大,但影响了这些投资的空间位置。