Suhasini G, Sonaa E, Shila S, Srikumari C R, Jayaraman G, Ramesh A
Department of Genetics, Dr ALM Post Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Madras, Chennai 600 113, India.
J Genet. 2011 Aug;90(2):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s12041-011-0067-9.
We analysed the genetic structure of ≈ 1000 samples representing 27 ethnic groups settled in Tamil Nadu, south India, derived from two linguistic families (Dravidians and Indo-Europeans) representing four religious groups (Hinduism, Islam, Christianity and Jainism) using 11 mtDNA markers. Out of 27 ethnic groups, four are in situ populations (Anglo-Indian, Labbai Muslim, Nadar Christian and south Indian Jain) and two are migrants (Gypsy and north Indian Jain) from north India to Tamil Nadu, and 21 are native ethnic groups. Six of the markers we used were monomorphic (HaeIII663, HpaI3592, AluI5176, AluI7025, AluI13262, 9-bp deletion) and five markers were polymorphic (DdeI10394, AluI10397, HinfI12308, HincII13259 and HaeIII16517). Haplogroup frequencies, genetic affinities and admixture analysis are based on the genotype data of polymorphic markers observed in these populations. Haplogroup frequencies indicate that various ethnic groups entered Tamil Nadu during different time periods. Genetic affinities and admixture estimates revealed that the ethnic groups possessing advanced knowledge of farming cluster in a branch (C), and could be the late arrived settlers as agriculture, was introduced to this region at about 5 to 3 thousand years ago. In situ ethnic groups appear to have arisen at various times as a result of the prevailing dominant socio-cultural forces. Hierarchical Hindu caste system created many ethnic groups in the history of its existence; some of them became isolated for considerable period of time. Over all, among Tamil ethnic groups, in spite of caste systems' rigidity, built in flexibility in the system in the form of hypergamy and hypogamy had allowed maternal gene flow between them.
我们使用11个线粒体DNA标记,分析了约1000个样本的遗传结构,这些样本代表了定居在印度南部泰米尔纳德邦的27个民族,源自两个语系(达罗毗荼语系和印欧语系),代表四个宗教群体(印度教、伊斯兰教、基督教和耆那教)。在这27个民族中,有四个是原地居民(英裔印度人、拉拜穆斯林、纳达尔基督徒和南印度耆那教徒),两个是从印度北部迁移到泰米尔纳德邦的移民(吉普赛人和北印度耆那教徒),还有21个是本地民族。我们使用的标记中有六个是单态的(HaeIII663、HpaI3592、AluI5176、AluI7025、AluI13262、9-bp缺失),五个标记是多态性的(DdeI10394、AluI10397、HinfI12308、HincII13259和HaeIII16517)。单倍群频率、遗传亲和力和混合分析基于在这些人群中观察到的多态性标记的基因型数据。单倍群频率表明,不同民族在不同时期进入泰米尔纳德邦。遗传亲和力和混合估计显示,拥有先进农耕知识的民族聚集在一个分支(C)中,并且可能是较晚到达的定居者,因为大约在5000至3000年前,农业才被引入该地区。原地民族似乎是由于当时占主导地位的社会文化力量在不同时期形成的。等级森严的印度教种姓制度在其存在的历史中创造了许多民族;其中一些民族在相当长的一段时间内处于隔离状态。总体而言,在泰米尔民族中,尽管种姓制度严格,但该制度以通婚和逆通婚形式存在的灵活性允许母系基因在他们之间流动。