Salama S M, Bolton F J, Hutchinson D N
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital.
Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Jun;104(3):405-11. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047427.
A new scheme for phagetyping campylobacters has been evaluated using strains isolated from five outbreaks. The phagetyping results have been compared with the results of Penner serotyping, Lior serotyping and Preston biotyping. Phagetyping recognized the causative strains in all of the incidents and also differentiated these strains from animal and environmental strains isolated during these investigations. In some outbreaks phagetyping proved to be more discriminatory than serotyping or biotyping, e.g. strains of Penner serotype 2, and serogroup 4, 13, 16, 50 were subdivided by this method. Phagetyping is to be recommended for typing strains from outbreaks and although the results indicate that it may be used alone we advocate that it should be used in conjunction with one of the established typing methods.
一种用于弯曲杆菌噬菌体分型的新方案已使用从五次暴发中分离出的菌株进行了评估。噬菌体分型结果已与彭纳血清分型、利奥血清分型和普雷斯顿生物分型的结果进行了比较。噬菌体分型识别出了所有事件中的致病菌株，并且还将这些菌株与在这些调查中分离出的动物和环境菌株区分开来。在一些暴发中，噬菌体分型被证明比血清分型或生物分型更具鉴别力，例如，彭纳血清型2以及血清群4、13、16、50的菌株通过这种方法被细分。推荐使用噬菌体分型对暴发中的菌株进行分型，尽管结果表明它可以单独使用，但我们主张它应与一种已确立的分型方法结合使用。
