Nimbulkar Gargi, Garacha Vikram, Shetty Vittaldas, Bhor Ketaki, Srivastava Kumar Chandan, Shrivastava Deepti, Sghaireen Mohammed G
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital (SPDC), Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (DMIMS), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S345-S351. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_101_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
The etiological relationship between the plaque and the gingival inflammation has been long established. The long-term use of chemical antiplaque agents may lead to side effects such as teeth staining and alteration of taste. Therefore, natural plant extracts with potential antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity have been explored, which are equally effective and safe for long-term use.
The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate effect of neem gel and chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on dental plaque, gingivitis, and bacterial count of and among 20-30-year-old school teachers in a city of western Maharashtra, over 90 days' usage.
A double-blind, parallel armed, controlled, randomized clinical study was conducted among 60 school teachers of 20-30 years' age group for 90 days. The two study groups were as follows: Group A--2.5% neem gel ( = 30) and Group B--0.2% CHX gel ( = 30). The plaque scores were recorded by Plaque Index (Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967;38:610-6) and gingival scores by Gingival Index (Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51). and species count by conventional culture method was carried out at baseline, 30th day and 90thday. Considering value <0.05 as statistically significant, intergroup comparison was performed using unpaired test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used followed by Tukey's test for intragroup comparison.
The mean plaque, gingival scores, and microbial count of and showed significant reduction at 30th and 90th day in neem gel group as well as CHX gel group ( < 0.05). None of the parameter showed any significant change at 30th and 90th day ( > 0.05) on intergroup comparison.
The neem gel showed significant decrease in dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial counts, which was comparable to CHX gel proving to be a good herbal alternative. No side effects were reported for use of neem gel over considered period of time.
牙菌斑与牙龈炎症之间的病因关系早已确立。长期使用化学防菌斑剂可能会导致牙齿染色和味觉改变等副作用。因此,人们探索了具有潜在抗菌和抗炎活性的天然植物提取物,它们长期使用同样有效且安全。
本研究旨在比较和评估印楝凝胶和氯己定(CHX)凝胶在90天的使用期内,对马哈拉施特拉邦西部一个城市20至30岁学校教师的牙菌斑、牙龈炎以及变形链球菌和远缘链球菌细菌计数的影响。
对60名年龄在20至30岁的学校教师进行了一项为期90天的双盲、平行组、对照、随机临床研究。两个研究组如下:A组——2.5%印楝凝胶(n = 30)和B组——0.2% CHX凝胶(n = 30)。通过菌斑指数(Löe H. 牙龈指数、菌斑指数和存留指数系统。《牙周病学杂志》1967年;38:610 - 6)记录菌斑分数,通过牙龈指数(Löe H, Silness J. 妊娠期牙周病。《口腔医学文献》1963年;21:533 - 51)记录牙龈分数。在基线、第30天和第90天通过传统培养方法进行变形链球菌和远缘链球菌菌种计数。将P值<0.05视为具有统计学意义,使用非配对t检验进行组间比较。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验,随后使用Tukey检验进行组内比较。
印楝凝胶组和CHX凝胶组在第30天和第90天的平均菌斑、牙龈分数以及变形链球菌和远缘链球菌的微生物计数均显著降低(P < 0.05)。组间比较时,在第30天和第90天,没有任何参数显示出任何显著变化(P > 0.05)。
印楝凝胶在牙菌斑、牙龈炎症和微生物计数方面显示出显著下降,与CHX凝胶相当,证明是一种良好的草药替代品。在考虑的时间段内,使用印楝凝胶未报告有副作用。