AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Jun;31(4):394-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00346.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
There are a number of studies in recent years that have examined the relationship of alcohol outlets to the incidence of alcohol-related problems. Only a small number of these studies examine the types of alcohol-related problems which may be considered amenity problems, such as neighbourhood disturbance, litter and noise. This paper examines the association between the proximity of someone's home to alcohol outlets and their experience of public amenity problems.
Data came from an Australian general population survey: the Alcohol's Harm to Others Survey (2008). Two thousand six hundred and forty-nine Australians aged 18 years and over were asked about their experiences of a number of amenity-type problems and the distance they lived to the nearest on- and off-premise alcohol outlet.
Bivariate results showed that respondents living closer to on- and off-premise outlets reported more problems, with minor differences by distance to on- and off-premise outlet. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, controlling for possible confounding effects of the respondent and neighbourhood characteristics, living closer to on-premise outlets was independently associated with reporting being kept awake or disturbed at night and living closer to an off-premise outlet was independently associated with reporting property damage.
A possible interpretation of the results is that respondents living close to on- and off-premise outlets experience more amenity problems than those living further away, but that these experiences are concentrated among demographic groups who live in these areas. Direction of influence cannot be inferred from these cross-sectional findings.
近年来,有许多研究探讨了酒类销售点与酒精相关问题发生率之间的关系。这些研究中只有少数研究检查了可能被认为是舒适性问题的酒精相关问题的类型,如邻里干扰、垃圾和噪音。本文研究了一个人的住所与酒类销售点的接近程度与其经历的公共舒适性问题之间的关联。
数据来自澳大利亚一项一般人群调查:“酒精对他人的危害调查”(2008 年)。2649 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的澳大利亚人被问及他们在一些舒适性问题上的经历,以及他们居住的地方离最近的酒类销售点(场内和场外)有多远。
双变量结果表明,居住在离场内和场外酒类销售点较近的受访者报告的问题更多,距离远近对场内和场外酒类销售点的影响略有不同。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,控制了受访者和邻里特征的可能混杂效应,居住在离场内酒类销售点较近与报告夜间被吵醒或干扰以及居住在离场外酒类销售点较近与报告财产损失独立相关。
对结果的一种可能解释是,居住在离场内和场外酒类销售点较近的受访者比居住在较远的受访者经历更多的舒适性问题,但这些经历集中在居住在这些地区的人口统计学群体中。这些横断面研究结果不能推断出影响的方向。