• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估照顾者需求并激活社区网络能否改善照顾者定义的结果?一项单盲、准实验性试点研究:社区促进者试点。

Can assessing caregiver needs and activating community networks improve caregiver-defined outcomes? A single-blind, quasi-experimental pilot study: community facilitator pilot.

机构信息

Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;26(7):917-23. doi: 10.1177/0269216311421834. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1177/0269216311421834
PMID:21930646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the unit of care in palliative care is defined as the patient and their family, there are few rigorous studies on how to improve support for family and friends as they take on the role of caregiver for someone at the end of life.

AIM

Separate to patient evaluation and care, this pilot study aimed to define the feasibility and possible outcome measures to evaluate routine assessments and supports specifically for caregivers.

DESIGN

In a quasi-experimental design, two communities were included: one received standard specialist palliative care support and one additionally was allocated to a community network facilitator who assessed caregivers' needs and helped mobilize the caregiver's own support network or initiated contact with other community supports in three planned visits. Data were collected at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks using three caregiver assessment tools. Within group comparisons were made using Wilcoxon signed rank test and between group using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-six caregivers participated.

RESULTS

At 8 weeks, participants in the intervention arm showed significant within-group improvement in caregiver fatigue, sufficient support from others, decreased resentment in the role, greater confidence in asking for assistance and were better able to find resources and support. No between-group changes were seen in this pilot study.

CONCLUSIONS

There were objective measures of improved support within the intervention group over time for caregivers through the active engagement of the community network facilitator. This pilot supports the case for an adequately powered study.

摘要

背景

尽管姑息治疗的护理单位被定义为患者及其家属,但很少有严格的研究来探讨如何为临终患者的家属和朋友提供支持,以帮助他们承担照顾者的角色。

目的

除了对患者进行评估和护理外,本试点研究旨在确定为照顾者进行常规评估和支持的可行性和可能的结果测量方法。

设计

采用准实验设计,纳入两个社区:一个社区接受标准的专科姑息治疗支持,另一个社区则额外分配一名社区网络协调员,负责评估照顾者的需求,并帮助调动照顾者自己的支持网络,或在三次计划访问中与其他社区支持联系。在基线、4 周和 8 周时使用三种照顾者评估工具收集数据。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行组内比较,使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行组间比较。

参与者

66 名照顾者参与了研究。

结果

在干预组,8 周时,参与者在照顾者疲劳、他人提供的足够支持、角色怨恨感减少、寻求帮助的信心增加以及更好地寻找资源和支持方面均显示出组内显著改善。在这个试点研究中,未观察到干预组与对照组之间的变化。

结论

通过社区网络协调员的积极参与,干预组的照顾者在支持方面有了客观的改善。这一试点研究支持了进行充分功率研究的理由。

相似文献

1
Can assessing caregiver needs and activating community networks improve caregiver-defined outcomes? A single-blind, quasi-experimental pilot study: community facilitator pilot.评估照顾者需求并激活社区网络能否改善照顾者定义的结果?一项单盲、准实验性试点研究:社区促进者试点。
Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;26(7):917-23. doi: 10.1177/0269216311421834. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
2
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
3
Predictors of caregiver distress among palliative home care clients in Ontario: evidence based on the interRAI Palliative Care.安大略省姑息治疗居家照护患者照顾者痛苦的预测因素:基于 interRAI 姑息治疗的证据。
Palliat Support Care. 2012 Sep;10(3):155-63. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000824. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial.应对技能干预对临终关怀癌症患者家庭照顾者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):214-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21567.
5
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
6
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Hospitalized elders and family caregivers: a typology of family worry.住院老年人及其家庭照顾者:家庭担忧的类型学
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jan;14(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01013.x.
8
Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on caregiver burden and depression.医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对照料者负担和抑郁的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):669-89.
9
Outcomes for family carers of a nurse-delivered hospital discharge intervention for older people (the Further Enabling Care at Home Program): Single blind randomised controlled trial.护士主导的老年人出院干预措施(家庭进一步支持护理计划)对家庭护理人员的影响:单盲随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
The health of family caregivers of older impaired persons in Lebanon: an interview survey.黎巴嫩老年残障人士家庭照料者的健康状况:一项访谈调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Feb;44(2):259-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.034. Epub 2006 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Unseen burden: Exploring caregiver experiences, barriers, and facilitators in foregut cancer care.无形的负担:探索前肠癌症护理中照顾者的经历、障碍和促进因素。
Surg Oncol Insight. 2025 Jun;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100153. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Public health palliative care interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers: a scoping review of studies that assess person-centered outcomes.促进社区支持临终者及其照护者的公共卫生姑息治疗干预措施:评估以患者为中心的结局的研究的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;11:1180571. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180571. eCollection 2023.
3
Primary care staff's willingness to participate in compassionate community network and palliative care and the barriers they face: a mixed methods study.
基层医疗工作人员参与富有同情心的社区网络和姑息治疗的意愿及其面临的障碍:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 21;11(9):e046961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046961.
4
Carer experience of end-of-life service provision: a social network analysis.照顾者对临终服务提供的体验:社会网络分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):e20. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001344. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
5
Education, Training, and Mentorship of Caregivers of Canadians Experiencing a Life-Limiting Illness.对经历绝症的加拿大人的护理人员的教育、培训和指导。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(S1):S45-S49. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0393.
6
Telemonitoring via Self-Report and Video Review in Community Palliative Care: A Case Report.社区姑息治疗中通过自我报告和视频回顾进行远程监测:病例报告
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Aug 31;5(3):51. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030051.
7
Volunteer navigation partnerships: Piloting a compassionate community approach to early palliative care.志愿者导航伙伴关系:探索早期姑息治疗的富有同情心的社区方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0210-3.
8
Using telehealth to support end of life care in the community: a feasibility study.利用远程医疗支持社区临终关怀:一项可行性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0167-7.
9
INSPIRE (INvestigating Social and PractIcal suppoRts at the End of life): Pilot randomised trial of a community social and practical support intervention for adults with life-limiting illness.激励(临终时社会与实际支持调查):针对患有生命受限疾病的成年人的社区社会与实际支持干预的试点随机试验
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 24;14:65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0060-9.