Suppr超能文献

激励(临终时社会与实际支持调查):针对患有生命受限疾病的成年人的社区社会与实际支持干预的试点随机试验

INSPIRE (INvestigating Social and PractIcal suppoRts at the End of life): Pilot randomised trial of a community social and practical support intervention for adults with life-limiting illness.

作者信息

McLoughlin Kathleen, Rhatigan Jim, McGilloway Sinead, Kellehear Allan, Lucey Michael, Twomey Feargal, Conroy Marian, Herrera-Molina Emillio, Kumar Suresh, Furlong Mairead, Callinan Joanne, Watson Max, Currow David, Bailey Christopher

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland.

Milford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 24;14:65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0060-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For most people, home is the preferred place of care and death. Despite the development of specialist palliative care and primary care models of community based service delivery, people who are dying, and their families/carers, can experience isolation, feel excluded from social circles and distanced from their communities. Loneliness and social isolation can have a detrimental impact on both health and quality of life. Internationally, models of social and practical support at the end of life are gaining momentum as a result of the Compassionate Communities movement. These models have not yet been subjected to rigorous evaluation. The aims of the study described in this protocol are: (1) to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of The Good Neighbour Partnership (GNP), a new volunteer-led model of social and practical care/support for community dwelling adults in Ireland who are living with advanced life-limiting illness; and (2) to pilot the method for a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT).

DESIGN

The INSPIRE study will be conducted within the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for the Evaluation of Complex Interventions (Phases 0-2) and includes an exploratory two-arm delayed intervention randomised controlled trial. Eighty patients and/or their carers will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: (I) Intervention: GNP in addition to standard care or (II) Control: Standard Care. Recipients of the GNP will be asked for their views on participating in both the study and the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative data will be gathered from both groups over eight weeks through face-to-face interviews which will be conducted before, during and after the intervention. The primary outcome is the effect of the intervention on social and practical need. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, loneliness, social support, social capital, unscheduled health service utilisation, caregiver burden, adverse impacts, and satisfaction with intervention. Volunteers engaged in the GNP will also be assessed in terms of their death anxiety, death self efficacy, self-reported knowledge and confidence with eleven skills considered necessary to be effective GNP volunteers.

DISCUSSION

The INSPIRE study addresses an important knowledge gap, providing evidence on the efficacy, utility and acceptability of a unique model of social and practical support for people living at home, with advanced life-limiting illness. The findings will be important in informing the development (and evaluation) of similar service models and policy elsewhere both nationally and internationally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN18400594 18(th) February 2015.

摘要

背景

对大多数人来说,家是首选的护理和离世之地。尽管专科姑息治疗及基于社区服务提供的初级护理模式有所发展,但濒死之人及其家人/照料者仍可能感到孤立,觉得被社会圈子排斥,与社区疏远。孤独和社会孤立会对健康和生活质量产生不利影响。在国际上,由于“关爱社区”运动,临终时的社会和实际支持模式正日益兴起。这些模式尚未经过严格评估。本方案所述研究的目的是:(1)评估“好邻居伙伴关系”(GNP)的可行性、可接受性和潜在效果,这是一种由志愿者主导的新模式,为爱尔兰患有晚期生命受限疾病的社区成年居民提供社会和实际护理/支持;(2)为三期随机对照试验(RCT)试点研究方法。

设计

“激励”研究将在医学研究理事会(MRC)复杂干预评估框架(0 - 2期)内进行,包括一项探索性双臂延迟干预随机对照试验。80名患者和/或其照料者将被随机分配到两个组中的一组:(I)干预组:除标准护理外接受GNP;或(II)对照组:标准护理。将询问接受GNP的人对参与研究和干预的看法。通过在干预前、干预期间和干预后进行的面对面访谈,在八周内从两组收集定量和定性数据。主要结局是干预对社会和实际需求的影响。次要结局包括生活质量、孤独感、社会支持、社会资本、非计划医疗服务利用、照料者负担、不利影响以及对干预的满意度。参与GNP的志愿者还将根据其死亡焦虑、死亡自我效能、自我报告的知识以及对作为有效的GNP志愿者所需的十一项技能的信心进行评估。

讨论

“激励”研究填补了一个重要的知识空白,为一种为在家中患有晚期生命受限疾病的人提供社会和实际支持的独特模式的有效性、实用性和可接受性提供了证据。研究结果对于为国内和国际其他地方类似服务模式和政策的制定(及评估)提供信息将具有重要意义。

试验注册

ISRCTN18400594,2015年2月18日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0260/4658760/5cf3c661754a/12904_2015_60_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
WA40 The good neighbour partnership: why do we need it? who is going to do it? how on earth are we going to evaluate it?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Apr;5 Suppl 1:A13. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000906.40.
3
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a compassionate community: a Canadian conceptual model for community capacity development.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Aug 28;17:26323524231193040. doi: 10.1177/26323524231193040. eCollection 2023.
2
How does community engagement evolve in different compassionate community contexts? A longitudinal comparative ethnographic research protocol.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Apr 21;17:26323524231168426. doi: 10.1177/26323524231168426. eCollection 2023.
3
The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Nov 30;16:26323524221139655. doi: 10.1177/26323524221139655. eCollection 2022.
4
Researching two Compassionate Cities: study protocol for a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Nov 26;16:26323524221137601. doi: 10.1177/26323524221137601. eCollection 2022.
5
Civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss: A systematic mixed-methods review.
Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;36(4):625-651. doi: 10.1177/02692163221077850. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Implementation Models of Compassionate Communities and Compassionate Cities at the End of Life: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):6271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176271.
9
The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: a community and health service partnership in Western Australia.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2020 Jul 2;14:2632352420935130. doi: 10.1177/2632352420935130. eCollection 2020.
10
The Relationship of Loneliness to End-of-Life Experience in Older Americans: A Cohort Study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 May;68(5):1064-1071. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16354. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of three shortened questionnaires for assessment of quality of life in advanced cancer.
J Palliat Med. 2014 Aug;17(8):918-23. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0012. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093762. eCollection 2014.
3
Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;4(3):285-90. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
7
The eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey: psychometric evaluation showed excellent performance.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;65(10):1107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验