Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143 0648, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):676-81. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834c1659.
This article will provide a review of mentorship in academic medicine. The review will include definitions and an overview of the evidence supporting the benefits, barriers, and structure of mentorship programmes in academic medicine and anesthesia. Finally, we will identify areas of further research.
Mentorship in medicine has been increasingly recognized as a core component of training and career advancement in academic medicine. Mentoring provides many benefits to both mentor and mentee and facilitates the growth of academic departments by improving research productivity, faculty career satisfaction, recruitment, and educational performance. Mentorship programmes may be formal or informal and should include some form of mentor education. There are several barriers to successful mentorship including time constraints, limited availability of mentors, gender, minority status, and generational differences. These barriers may be overcome with improved awareness and sensitivity. Further investigation into the prevalence of mentorship and specific needs in our specialty are urgently required.
Mentorship has been demonstrated to be an integral part of training and career development in academic medicine and benefits both mentees and mentors. Despite the promotion of mentorship in many academic anesthesia departments, little is published in the available literature supporting mentorship in anesthesia.
本文将对医学学术领域中的指导关系进行综述。综述将包括定义和支持医学学术领域及麻醉学领域指导计划的益处、障碍和结构的证据概述。最后，我们将确定进一步研究的领域。
在医学领域，指导关系已逐渐被视为医学学术培训和职业发展的核心组成部分。指导关系为导师和学员双方都提供了许多益处，并通过提高研究生产力、教职员工职业满意度、招聘和教育绩效来促进学术部门的发展。指导计划可以是正式的，也可以是非正式的，并且应该包括某种形式的导师教育。成功指导关系的障碍包括时间限制、导师资源有限、性别、少数族裔地位和代际差异。通过提高认识和敏感性，可以克服这些障碍。迫切需要进一步调查我们专业领域中指导关系的普遍存在和具体需求。
指导关系已被证明是医学学术培训和职业发展不可或缺的一部分，对学员和导师都有好处。尽管许多学术麻醉部门都提倡指导关系，但在可用文献中几乎没有发表支持麻醉学指导关系的内容。
