School of Science, Department of Psychology, University of Derby, UK.
Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1242-7. doi: 10.1037/a0024279.
Neuroimaging data suggest that emotional information, especially threatening faces, automatically captures attention and receives rapid processing. While this is consistent with the majority of behavioral data, behavioral studies of the attentional blink (AB) additionally reveal that aversive emotional first target (T1) stimuli are associated with prolonged attentional engagement or "dwell" time. One explanation for this difference is that few AB studies have utilized manipulations of facial emotion as the T1. To address this, schematic faces varying in expression (neutral, angry, happy) served as the T1 in the current research. Results revealed that the blink associated with an angry T1 face was, primarily, of greater magnitude than that associated with either a neutral or happy T1 face, and also that initial recovery from this processing bias was faster following angry, compared with happy, T1 faces. The current data therefore provide important information regarding the time-course of attentional capture by angry faces: Angry faces are associated with both the rapid capture and rapid release of attention.
神经影像学数据表明,情绪信息,特别是威胁性面孔,会自动吸引注意力并进行快速处理。虽然这与大多数行为数据一致,但对注意瞬脱(AB)的行为研究还表明,令人厌恶的情绪的第一个目标(T1)刺激与注意力持续时间延长或“滞留”时间有关。对于这种差异的一种解释是,很少有 AB 研究使用面部表情的操纵作为 T1。为了解决这个问题,当前的研究中,以不同表情(中性、愤怒、高兴)的示意图面孔作为 T1。结果表明,与中性或高兴的 T1 面孔相比,与愤怒的 T1 面孔相关的眨眼幅度更大,并且在经历了愤怒的 T1 面孔后,从这种处理偏差中恢复的速度也更快。因此,当前的数据提供了关于愤怒面孔引起注意力捕获的时间进程的重要信息:愤怒的面孔既与注意力的快速捕获有关,也与注意力的快速释放有关。