Petrucci Manuel, Pecchinenda Anna
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):439-452. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1470-y.
The performance impairment (attentional blink, AB) on a second target (T2) when it is presented within 200-500 ms after a first target (T1) during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) is typically attributed to resource depletion. The AB does not occur when targets appear in immediate sequence (sparing). Recently, this account has been challenged by findings that the lag 1 sparing can spread to later lags when using a 3-target RSVP. Two experiments using the 3-targets RSVP investigated the relative contribution of resource depletion and attentional enhancement and/or inhibition on the AB and the sparing when T1 (Exp. 1) or T3 (Exp. 2) are emotionally salient. Findings showed a greater sparing for neutral T3s when preceded by negative compared with neutral T1s (Exp. 1) and for negative T3s (Exp. 2). In contrast, the AB on neutral T3s was greater after negative than after neutral T1s (Exp. 1), but it was reduced when T3 was negative (Exp. 2). The AB and the sparing also depended on how many targets before T3 were correctly reported. These findings indicate that although there is a cost for processing multiple targets, the emotional modulations of the AB and the sparing are better explained by an interplay between emotion-enhancement and capacity limitations on temporal selective attention.
在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)过程中,当第二个目标(T2)在第一个目标(T1)之后200 - 500毫秒内呈现时出现的表现损伤(注意瞬脱,AB)通常归因于资源耗竭。当目标依次立即出现时(幸免效应),不会出现注意瞬脱。最近,这一观点受到了一些研究结果的挑战,这些结果表明,在使用三目标RSVP时,滞后1的幸免效应可以扩展到后续滞后。两项使用三目标RSVP的实验研究了资源耗竭以及注意增强和/或抑制对注意瞬脱和幸免效应的相对贡献,其中T1(实验1)或T3(实验2)具有情绪显著性。结果表明,与中性T1相比,在负性T1之后的中性T3的幸免效应更大(实验1),对于负性T3也是如此(实验2)。相比之下,中性T3的注意瞬脱在负性T1之后比在中性T1之后更大(实验1),但当T3为负性时注意瞬脱会降低(实验2)。注意瞬脱和幸免效应还取决于在T3之前有多少目标被正确报告。这些结果表明,虽然处理多个目标存在代价,但注意瞬脱和幸免效应的情绪调节更好地由情绪增强与时间选择性注意的能力限制之间的相互作用来解释。