• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科癌症患者父母和医护人员对口腔黏膜炎预防的看法。

Perspectives toward oral mucositis prevention from parents and health care professionals in pediatric cancer.

机构信息

Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1274-x. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-011-1274-x
PMID:21947490
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were: (1) to describe parents and health care professionals (HCPs) perceived importance of oral mucositis prevention in children with cancer; (2) To describe utilities and willingness-to-pay (WTP) to prevent mucositis.

METHODS

Respondents included parents of children receiving intensive chemotherapy for leukemia/lymphoma or undergoing stem cell transplantation and HCPs caring for children with cancer. Importance of mild and severe oral mucositis was estimated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Mucositis-associated utilities were elicited using the time trade-off technique (TTO). WTP to avoid mucositis was obtained using contingent valuation. These techniques quantify how much time or money the participant is willing to relinquish in order to prevent mucositis.

RESULTS

Eighty-two parents and 60 HCPs were included. Parents and HCPs believed mild mucositis to be of similar importance (median VAS 2.5 versus 3.6; P = 0.357) while parents considered severe mucositis less important than HCPs (median VAS 8.3 versus 9.0; P < 0.0001). No differences in parent versus HCP responses were seen with TTO (mild or severe mucositis) and most parents were not willing to trade any survival time to prevent severe mucositis. Parents were willing to pay significantly more than HCPs to prevent mild mucositis (average median WTP $1,371 CAN vs. $684 CAN, P = 0.031). No differences were seen in WTP to prevent severe mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents and HCP believe severe mucositis to be important, although it is more important to HCPs. Parents would not be willing to reduce life expectancy to eliminate mucositis.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)描述癌症患儿的父母和医护人员(HCP)对预防口腔黏膜炎的重要性的认知;(2)描述预防黏膜炎的效用和支付意愿(WTP)。

方法

调查对象包括正在接受白血病/淋巴瘤强化化疗或进行干细胞移植的患儿父母以及照顾癌症患儿的 HCP。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估轻度和重度口腔黏膜炎的重要性。使用时间权衡技术(TTO)得出与黏膜炎相关的效用。通过条件价值评估法获得避免黏膜炎的 WTP。这些技术可量化参与者为预防黏膜炎而愿意放弃多少时间或金钱。

结果

共纳入 82 名患儿父母和 60 名 HCP。父母和 HCP 认为轻度黏膜炎的重要性相似(VAS 中位数分别为 2.5 和 3.6;P=0.357),而父母认为重度黏膜炎的重要性低于 HCP(VAS 中位数分别为 8.3 和 9.0;P<0.0001)。TTO 评估中,父母与 HCP 的回答没有差异(轻度或重度黏膜炎),且大多数父母不愿为预防重度黏膜炎而牺牲任何生存时间。父母预防轻度黏膜炎的支付意愿明显高于 HCP(平均中位 WTP 分别为 1371 加元和 684 加元,P=0.031)。预防重度黏膜炎的 WTP 没有差异。

结论

父母和 HCP 认为重度黏膜炎很重要,尽管对 HCP 来说更重要。父母不愿意为了消除黏膜炎而减少预期寿命。

相似文献

1
Perspectives toward oral mucositis prevention from parents and health care professionals in pediatric cancer.儿科癌症患者父母和医护人员对口腔黏膜炎预防的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1274-x. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
2
Psychometric properties of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire for child self-report and importance of mucositis in children treated with chemotherapy.口腔黏膜炎每日问卷儿童自评的心理测量特性及儿童接受化疗时口腔黏膜炎的重要性。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jun;20(6):1251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1211-z. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
3
Factors affecting treatment choices in paediatric palliative care: comparing parents and health professionals.影响儿科姑息治疗治疗选择的因素:比较父母和卫生专业人员。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47(14):2182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.038. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
4
Preferences for health outcomes associated with Group A Streptococcal disease and vaccination.与 A 组链球菌疾病和疫苗接种相关的健康结果偏好。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Mar 12;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-28.
5
What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK.在急诊科管理儿童发热时,什么最重要?一项英国父母和医疗保健专业人员偏好的离散选择实验比较。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Aug;105(8):765-771. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318209. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.照料者和父母身份对健康状态描述的时间权衡和标准博弈效用评分的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 9;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-48.
7
Complementary and integrative health methods used for the treatment of oral mucositis in children with cancer in Turkey.土耳其用于治疗癌症患儿口腔黏膜炎的补充和综合健康方法。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Jul;24(3):e12260. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12260. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Oral mucositis: a phenomenological study of pediatric patients' and their parents' perspectives and experiences.口腔黏膜炎:一项关于儿科患者及其父母观点与经历的现象学研究
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jul;17(7):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0618-2. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
9
Reliability and construct validity of the oral mucositis daily questionnaire in children with cancer.癌症患儿口腔黏膜炎每日问卷的信度和结构效度。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Feb;47(3):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
10
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.针对接受治疗的癌症患者预防口腔黏膜炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD000978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000978.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient preferences and willingness to pay for dental services: a systematic review.患者对牙科服务的偏好及支付意愿:一项系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05520-6.
2
Psychometric evaluation of Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire: A cross-cultural adaptation of the Malay version in multiethnic adult autologous stem cell transplant.口腔黏膜炎每日问卷的心理测量学评估:多民族成年自体干细胞移植中马来语版本的跨文化改编
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Dec 27;10(2):100180. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100180. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferences for type 2 diabetes health states among adolescents with or at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.青少年 2 型糖尿病患者或有 2 型糖尿病风险者对 2 型糖尿病健康状况的偏好。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Dec;12(8):724-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00772.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: the individual perspective.对质量调整生命年的支付意愿:个体视角。
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):1046-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00781.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
3
Willingness to pay for a QALY based on community member and patient preferences for temporary health states associated with herpes zoster.
偏好 elicitation 技术在评估儿童健康相关生活质量中的应用:系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jul;40(7):663-698. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01149-3. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Prevalence of Missing Values and Protest Zeros in Contingent Valuation in Dental Medicine.牙科医学中条件价值评估中缺失值和无效零值的流行率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147219.
5
An overview of the methodological aspects and policy implications of willingness-to-pay studies in oral health: a scoping review of existing literature.口腔健康意愿支付研究方法学方面和政策影响概述:对现有文献的范围综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01303-3.
6
Supportive care during pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: beyond infectious diseases. A report from workshops on supportive care of the Pediatric Diseases Working Party (PDWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).儿童造血干细胞移植期间的支持性护理:超越传染病。欧洲血液与骨髓移植协会(EBMT)儿科疾病工作小组(PDWP)支持性护理研讨会报告。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;55(6):1126-1136. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0818-4. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies.福沙匹坦、格拉司琼和地塞米松联合预防性止吐在小儿血液肿瘤恶性疾病患者中的疗效、安全性及可行性
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Sep 30;13:3439-3451. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S214264. eCollection 2019.
8
A brief literature review and own clinical experience in prophylaxis of oral mucositis in children using low level laser therapy.关于使用低强度激光疗法预防儿童口腔黏膜炎的简要文献综述及个人临床经验。
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2019 Mar;9(1):1. doi: 10.1051/bmdcn/2019090101. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Critical review of willingness to pay for clinical oral health interventions.临床口腔健康干预措施支付意愿的批判性评价。
J Dent. 2017 Sep;64:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Guideline for the prevention of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis in children receiving treatment for cancer or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.癌症治疗或接受造血干细胞移植儿童口腔和口咽黏膜炎预防指南。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar;7(1):7-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000804. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
社区成员和患者对与带状疱疹相关的临时健康状态的偏好为基础的 QALY 的支付意愿。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2165/11314000-000000000-00000.
4
Clofarabine, cyclophosphamide and etoposide as single-course re-induction therapy for children with refractory/multiple relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.用克拉屈滨、环磷酰胺和依托泊苷进行单疗程再诱导治疗,用于治疗耐药/多重复发的急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿。
Br J Haematol. 2009 Nov;147(3):371-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07882.x. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
5
Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes.改进决策分析:儿科健康结果的家长偏好(效用值)。
J Pediatr. 2009 Jul;155(1):21-5, 25.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.040. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
6
Early outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies following single fraction TBI.单剂量全身照射后血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿接受异基因造血干细胞移植的早期结局
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Feb;43(4):307-14. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.327. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
7
Oral mucositis in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: analysis of 169 paediatric patients.急性淋巴细胞白血病中的口腔黏膜炎:169例儿科患者的分析
Oral Dis. 2008 Nov;14(8):761-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01468.x. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
8
Evaluating the supportive care costs of severe radiochemotherapy-induced mucositis and pharyngitis : results from a Northwestern University Costs of Cancer Program pilot study with head and neck and nonsmall cell lung cancer patients who received care at a county hospital, a Veterans Administration hospital, or a comprehensive cancer care center.评估严重放化疗引起的粘膜炎和咽炎的支持性护理成本:西北大学癌症成本项目的一项试点研究结果,该研究涉及在县医院、退伍军人管理局医院或综合癌症护理中心接受治疗的头颈癌和非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cancer. 2008 Sep 15;113(6):1446-52. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23714.
9
Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.比较支付卡条件价值评估法与离散选择实验得出的福利估计值。
Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):389-401. doi: 10.1002/hec.1364.
10
Risk factors for oral mucositis in children undergoing chemotherapy: a matched case-control study.化疗儿童口腔黏膜炎的危险因素:一项匹配病例对照研究。
Oral Oncol. 2008 Nov;44(11):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 7.