• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

42 岁时客观测量的身体活动和久坐行为的青少年预测因素:阿姆斯特丹生长和健康纵向研究(AGAHLS)。

Adolescent predictors of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour at age 42: the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study (AGAHLS).

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 2;8:107. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-107.

DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-8-107
PMID:21961795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3198875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the associations of physical characteristics and personality in adolescence with physical activity and sedentary behaviour in adulthood.

FINDINGS

Physical characteristics (i.e. objectively measured BMI, sum of skin folds, MOPER test battery performance), and personality (i.e. self-reported inadequacy, social inadequacy, rigidity, self-sufficiency/recalcitrance, dominance, achievement motivation, facilitating anxiety, debilitating anxiety, and social desirability) were assessed in 217 adolescent boys (Mean 13.0, SD 0.6) and girls (Mean 12.9, SD 0.6). Twenty-nine years later, at the age of 42, their physical activity and sedentary behaviour were assessed by means of accelerometry. Boys who scored lower on self-sufficiency/recalcitrance and higher on facilitating anxiety spent more time sedentary in adulthood. Girls with a superior standing high jump performance, and a lower score on social desirability spent more time sedentary in adulthood. In contrast with sedentary behaviour, physical activity at age 42 year could not be predicted by physical characteristics or personality in adolescence.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedentary behaviour in adulthood was partly explained by physical characteristics and/or personality in adolescence. Thus, our results suggest that it may be possible to identify people who are at risk of becoming sedentary at a rather young age.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨青少年时期的身体特征和个性与成年后体力活动和久坐行为的关系。

发现

在 217 名青少年男孩(平均年龄 13.0,标准差 0.6)和女孩(平均年龄 12.9,标准差 0.6)中,评估了身体特征(即客观测量的 BMI、皮褶总和、MOPER 测试电池性能)和个性(即自我报告的不称职、社交不称职、僵化、自给自足/固执、支配、成就动机、促进焦虑、衰弱焦虑和社交期望)。29 年后,在他们 42 岁时,通过加速度计评估他们的体力活动和久坐行为。自我效能感/固执得分较低、促进焦虑得分较高的男孩在成年后久坐时间较长。站立式跳高成绩较好、社交期望得分较低的女孩在成年后久坐时间较长。与久坐行为不同,42 岁时的体力活动无法通过青少年时期的身体特征或个性来预测。

结论

成年后的久坐行为部分可以用青少年时期的身体特征和/或个性来解释。因此,我们的结果表明,有可能识别出那些在相当年轻的时候就有久坐风险的人。

相似文献

1
Adolescent predictors of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour at age 42: the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study (AGAHLS).42 岁时客观测量的身体活动和久坐行为的青少年预测因素:阿姆斯特丹生长和健康纵向研究(AGAHLS)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 2;8:107. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-107.
2
Relation between the longitudinal development of personality characteristics and biological and lifestyle risk factors for coronary heart disease.人格特质的纵向发展与冠心病的生物及生活方式风险因素之间的关系。
Psychosom Med. 1998 May-Jun;60(3):372-7. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199805000-00027.
3
Direction of the association between body fatness and self-reported screen time in Dutch adolescents.荷兰青少年体脂与自述屏幕时间之间关联的方向。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jan 24;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-4.
4
Person-related determinants of TV viewing and computer time in a cohort of young Dutch adults: Who sits the most?荷兰年轻成年人队列中与个人相关的电视观看和电脑使用时间的决定因素:谁久坐时间最长?
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Oct;25(5):716-23. doi: 10.1111/sms.12295. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
5
Study protocol: the relation of birth weight and infant growth trajectories with physical fitness, physical activity and sedentary behavior at 8-9 years of age - the ABCD study.研究方案:8-9 岁时出生体重和婴儿生长轨迹与体能、身体活动和久坐行为的关系——ABCD 研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Jul 9;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-102.
6
Child socioemotional behavior and adult temperament as predictors of physical activity and sedentary behavior in late adulthood.儿童社会情感行为和成人气质对晚年体力活动和久坐行为的预测作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):1179. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16110-y.
7
The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study: how important is physical activity in youth for later health? (ELS 33).阿姆斯特丹生长与健康纵向研究:青少年时期的体育活动对后期健康有多重要?(ELS 33)
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019;30(3):138-141. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-057. Epub 2019 May 24.
8
Association between Clustering of Lifestyle Behaviors and Health-Related Physical Fitness in Youth: The UP&DOWN Study.生活方式行为聚类与青少年健康相关体能的关系:UP&DOWN 研究。
J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;199:41-48.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.075. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Weight Status Is Related to Health-Related Physical Fitness and Physical Activity but Not to Sedentary Behaviour in Children.体重状况与儿童的健康相关体能和身体活动有关,但与久坐行为无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124518.
10
Associations between objectively assessed and questionnaire-based sedentary behaviour with body mass index and systolic blood pressure in Kuwaiti adolescents.科威特青少年中基于客观评估和问卷调查的久坐行为与体重指数及收缩压之间的关联。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 18;12(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4626-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in the Association between Prolonged Sitting Time and Anxiety Prevalence among Korean Adults.韩国成年人久坐时间与焦虑症患病率之间关联的性别差异
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 20;14(7):729. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070729.
2
Relationship between physical activity, screen-related sedentary behaviors and anxiety among adolescents in less developed areas of China.中国欠发达地区青少年体力活动、与屏幕相关的久坐行为与焦虑之间的关系。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 30;101(39):e30848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030848.
3
Patterns of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Emotional Disorder Symptoms Among Youth.客观测量的久坐时间与青少年情绪障碍症状的关系模式。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;47(7):757-768. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac014.
4
Are senior high school students in Ghana meeting WHO's recommended level of physical activity? Evidence from the 2012 Global School-based Student Health Survey Data.加纳高中生的身体活动量是否达到世卫组织建议的水平?来自 2012 年全球学校学生健康调查数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0229012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229012. eCollection 2020.
5
Sedentary behaviors and anxiety among children, adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童、青少年和成年人的久坐行为与焦虑:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6715-3.
6
Association of Personality on Changes in Weekday Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evaluation.人格与工作日久坐时间变化的关联:横断面和前瞻性评估
J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Jan;9(1):60-66. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Predictors of tobacco and alcohol co-use from ages 15 to 32: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study.15至32岁烟草与酒精共同使用的预测因素:阿姆斯特丹生长与健康纵向研究
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Dec;26(6):549-559. doi: 10.1037/pha0000203. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
An examination of objectively-measured sedentary behavior and mental well-being in adults across week days and weekends.一项关于成年人在工作日和周末客观测量的久坐行为与心理健康的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185143. eCollection 2017.
9
The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review.久坐行为与焦虑风险之间的关联:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 19;15:513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1843-x.
10
Sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with physical activity in Brazilian adolescents.巴西青少年中与身体活动相关的社会人口学和行为因素。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 21;14:485. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-485.

本文引用的文献

1
Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.久坐生活方式的生理和健康影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Dec;35(6):725-40. doi: 10.1139/H10-079.
2
The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews.干预措施改变六种健康行为的效果:系统评价综述。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 8;10:538. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-538.
3
Motor fitness in Dutch youth: differences over a 26-year period (1980-2006).荷兰青少年的运动能力:26 年间(1980-2006 年)的差异。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 May;13(3):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
4
The evolving definition of "sedentary".“久坐”定义的演变
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008 Oct;36(4):173-8. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181877d1a.
5
Sedentary behavior.久坐行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):502-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.08.002.
6
Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab).客观测量的久坐时间、身体活动与代谢风险:澳大利亚糖尿病、肥胖与生活方式研究(AusDiab)
Diabetes Care. 2008 Feb;31(2):369-71. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1795. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
7
Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.低能量消耗和久坐行为在肥胖、代谢综合征、2型糖尿病及心血管疾病中的作用。
Diabetes. 2007 Nov;56(11):2655-67. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
8
Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry.通过加速度计评估的成年人群的身体活动与不活动情况。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1502-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180a76de5.
9
Personality correlates of physical activity: a review and meta-analysis.身体活动与人格的相关性:一项综述与荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;40(12):958-65. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.028860.
10
Social desirability is associated with some physical activity, psychosocial variables and sedentary behavior but not self-reported physical activity among adolescent males.社会期望与一些身体活动、心理社会变量和久坐行为有关,但与青少年男性自我报告的身体活动无关。
Health Educ Res. 2007 Jun;22(3):438-49. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl107. Epub 2006 Sep 20.