• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非麻醉医师实施平衡丙泊酚镇静:意大利的首次经验。

Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: The first Italian experience.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 7;17(33):3818-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3818.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3818
PMID:21987624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3181443/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of a balanced approach using midazolam in combination with propofol, administered by non-anesthesiologists, in a large series of diagnostic colonoscopies.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy were sedated with a single dose of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and low-dose propofol (starter bolus of 0.5 mg/kg and repeated boluses of 10 to 20 mg). Induction time and deepest level of sedation, adverse and serious adverse events, as well as recovery times, were prospectively assessed. Cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates were also collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 1593 eligible patients were included. The median dose of propofol administered was 70 mg (range: 40-120 mg), and the median dose of midazolam was 2.3 mg (range: 2-4 mg). Median induction time of sedation was 3 min (range: 1-4 min), and median recovery time was 23 min (range: 10-40 min). A moderate level of sedation was achieved in 1561 (98%) patients, whilst a deep sedation occurred in 32 (2%) cases. Transient oxygen desaturation requiring further oxygen supplementation occurred in 8 (0.46%; 95% CI: 0.2%-0.8%) patients. No serious adverse event was observed. Cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates were 93.5% and 23.4% (27.8% for male and 18.5% for female, subjects), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A balanced sedation protocol provided a minimalization of the dose of propofol needed to target a moderate sedation for colonoscopy, resulting in a high safety profile for non-anesthesiologist propofol sedation.

摘要

目的

评估非麻醉医师使用咪达唑仑联合异丙酚进行平衡镇静在大量诊断性结肠镜检查中的疗效和安全性。

方法

连续接受诊断性结肠镜检查的患者接受咪达唑仑(0.05mg/kg)单次剂量和低剂量异丙酚(起始剂量 0.5mg/kg,重复给予 10-20mg)镇静。前瞻性评估诱导时间和镇静最深程度、不良和严重不良事件以及恢复时间。还收集了盲肠插管率和腺瘤检出率。

结果

共有 1593 名符合条件的患者纳入研究。异丙酚的中位给药剂量为 70mg(范围:40-120mg),咪达唑仑的中位剂量为 2.3mg(范围:2-4mg)。镇静诱导时间的中位数为 3 分钟(范围:1-4 分钟),恢复时间的中位数为 23 分钟(范围:10-40 分钟)。98%(1561 例)患者达到中度镇静,2%(32 例)患者出现深度镇静。8 例(0.46%;95%CI:0.2%-0.8%)患者出现短暂性氧饱和度下降,需要进一步吸氧。未观察到严重不良事件。盲肠插管率和腺瘤检出率分别为 93.5%和 23.4%(男性为 27.8%,女性为 18.5%,对象)。

结论

平衡镇静方案使需要达到中度镇静的异丙酚剂量最小化,为非麻醉医师异丙酚镇静提供了高安全性。

相似文献

1
Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: The first Italian experience.非麻醉医师实施平衡丙泊酚镇静:意大利的首次经验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 7;17(33):3818-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3818.
2
Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.结肠镜检查的患者自控镇静:一项随机试验,比较丙泊酚和阿芬太尼的患者自控给药与医生给予的咪达唑仑和哌替啶。
Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):683-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41519.
3
Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.单独使用丙泊酚滴定至深度镇静与丙泊酚联合阿片类药物和/或苯二氮䓬类药物滴定至中度镇静用于结肠镜检查的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2209-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00760.x.
4
Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study.结肠镜检查中咪达唑仑与丙泊酚联合镇静对比咪达唑仑与哌替啶联合镇静的协同作用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Aug;97(8):1963-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05908.x.
5
Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam.内镜检查期间的中度镇静:一项使用低剂量丙泊酚、哌替啶/芬太尼和咪达唑仑的前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun;59(7):795-803. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00349-9.
6
One year experience with computer-assisted propofol sedation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中应用计算机辅助异丙酚镇静的一年经验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 28;23(16):2964-2971. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2964.
7
Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑/哌替啶用于门诊结肠镜检查:由内镜医师监督护士给药
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):815-25. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124636.
8
A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy.一项关于结肠镜检查低剂量丙泊酚镇静方案的前瞻性安全性研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):563-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.013.
9
Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe in low risk patients: results of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.非麻醉医师管理丙泊酚镇静用于结肠镜检查在低危患者中是安全的:一项非劣效性随机对照试验的结果。
Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):747-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105560. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
10
Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol.护士给予丙泊酚镇静的患者结肠镜检查的技术性能
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):52-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04022.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation with Propofol Administered by Non-Anesthetists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非麻醉医师使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静的成年患者不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(10):1234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101234.
2
Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Medical Pleuroscopy (MP) Performed under Balanced Analgosedation by a Pneumological Team Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS): A Retrospective Controlled Real-Life Study (TORAPO).与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)相比,由肺病学团队在平衡镇痛镇静下进行的内科胸腔镜检查(MP)的安全性和诊断率:一项回顾性对照现实生活研究(TORAPO)。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;14(6):569. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060569.
3
Combination of propofol and nasal sufentanil or intravenous midazolam for colonoscopy: a comparative study.丙泊酚联合鼻内舒芬太尼或静脉注射咪达唑仑用于结肠镜检查:一项比较研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(2):146-152. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.106298.
4
Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.丙泊酚与地佐辛联合使用以提高成人胃镜和结肠镜检查麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Oct 26;7(20):3237-3246. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3237.
5
Incidental diagnosis of very small rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: when should endoscopic submucosal dissection be performed? A single ENETS centre experience.偶然诊断出非常小的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤:何时应进行内镜黏膜下剥离术?单中心 ENETS 经验。
Endocrine. 2019 Jul;65(1):207-212. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01907-y. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea.韩国目前结肠镜检查的能力和质量。
Intest Res. 2019 Jan;17(1):119-126. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00060. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Safety of non-anesthesia provider administered propofol sedation in non-advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A meta-analysis.非麻醉专业人员在非高级胃肠道内镜检查中给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 May-Jun;23(3):133-143. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_501_16.
8
Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy.地佐辛联合丙泊酚用于无痛结肠镜检查麻醉的临床研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 28;22(24):5609-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5609.
9
National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program Remains Suboptimal in Korea.韩国国家内镜质量改进计划仍未达到最佳状态。
Gut Liver. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):699-705. doi: 10.5009/gnl15623.
10
Current role of non-anesthesiologist administered propofol sedation in advanced interventional endoscopy.非麻醉医生实施丙泊酚镇静在高级介入内镜检查中的当前作用
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug 10;7(10):981-6. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.981.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedation in digestive endoscopy: the Athens international position statements.消化内镜镇静:雅典国际立场声明。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Aug;32(3):425-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04352.x. Epub 2010 May 8.
2
Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy.立场声明:非麻醉医师在胃肠内镜检查中使用丙泊酚。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):2161-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.050.
3
Participation in colorectal cancer screening with FOBT and colonoscopy: an Italian, multicentre, randomized population study.结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验用于结直肠癌筛查的效果比较:意大利多中心随机人群研究
Dig Liver Dis. 2010 May;42(5):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
4
Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.内镜医师指导下丙泊酚的给药:全球安全性经验
Gastroenterology. 2009 Oct;137(4):1229-37; quiz 1518-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.042. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
5
Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography.呼吸活动的二氧化碳波形图监测可提高内镜下胰胆管造影术和超声检查镇静的安全性。
Gastroenterology. 2009 May;136(5):1568-76; quiz 1819-20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.004.
6
Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.结肠镜检查的技术性能:镇静/镇痛及其他质量指标的关键作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01778.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
7
Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.意大利的结肠镜检查实践:代表意大利医院胃肠病学家协会开展的一项前瞻性调查。
Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Nov;40(11):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
8
A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy.一项关于结肠镜检查中丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼与咪达唑仑/芬太尼患者自控镇静的随机、对照、双盲试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):434-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297300.33441.32.
9
Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.比较结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查及粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)用于结直肠癌筛查的就诊率和检出率。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2304-12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.030. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
10
A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy.一项关于结肠镜检查低剂量丙泊酚镇静方案的前瞻性安全性研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):563-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.013.