Yagupsky P, Nolte F S
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):269-79. doi: 10.1128/CMR.3.3.269.
For years, quantitative blood cultures found only limited use as aids in the diagnosis and management of septic patients because the available methods were cumbersome, labor intensive, and practical only for relatively small volumes of blood. The development and subsequent commercial availability of lysis-centrifugation direct plating methods for blood cultures have addressed many of the shortcomings of the older methods. The lysis-centrifugation method has demonstrated good performance relative to broth-based blood culture methods. As a result, quantitative blood cultures have found widespread use in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most episodes of clinical significant bacteremia in adults are characterized by low numbers of bacteria per milliliter of blood. In children, the magnitude of bacteremia is generally much higher, with the highest numbers of bacteria found in the blood of septic neonates. The magnitude of bacteremia correlates with the severity of disease in children and with mortality rates in adults, but other factors play more important roles in determining the patient's outcome. Serial quantitative blood cultures have been used to monitor the in vivo efficacy of antibiotic therapy in patients with slowly resolving sepsis, such as disseminated Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare complex infections. Quantitative blood culture methods were used in early studies of bacterial endocarditis, and the results significantly contributed to our understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease. Comparison of paired quantitative blood cultures obtained from a peripheral vein and the central venous catheter has been used to help identify patients with catheter-related sepsis and is the only method that does not require removal of the catheter to establish the diagnosis. Quantitation of bacteria in the blood can also help distinguish contaminated from truly positive blood cultures; however, no quantitative criteria can invariably differentiate contamination from bacteremia.
多年来,定量血培养在脓毒症患者的诊断和管理中仅得到有限的应用,因为现有的方法操作繁琐、 labor intensive,且仅适用于相对少量的血液。血培养裂解离心直接接种方法的发展及随后的商业可用性解决了旧方法的许多缺点。与基于肉汤的血培养方法相比,裂解离心法已显示出良好的性能。因此,定量血培养在临床微生物学实验室中得到了广泛应用。成人大多数具有临床意义的菌血症发作的特点是每毫升血液中的细菌数量较少。在儿童中,菌血症的程度通常要高得多,在脓毒症新生儿的血液中发现的细菌数量最多。菌血症的程度与儿童疾病的严重程度以及成人的死亡率相关,但在决定患者的预后方面,其他因素起着更重要的作用。连续定量血培养已用于监测脓毒症缓解缓慢的患者(如播散性鸟分枝杆菌-胞内分枝杆菌复合感染)抗生素治疗的体内疗效。定量血培养方法曾用于细菌性心内膜炎的早期研究,其结果对我们理解这种疾病的病理生理学有显著贡献。比较从外周静脉和中心静脉导管采集的配对定量血培养结果,有助于识别与导管相关的脓毒症患者,这是唯一一种无需拔除导管即可确诊的方法。血液中细菌的定量也有助于区分污染的血培养和真正阳性的血培养;然而,没有定量标准能够始终如一地区分污染和菌血症。