Suppr超能文献

非法移民是否享有健康权?在特拉维夫的一个开放诊所中,从社会实践角度探讨伦理理论。

Do "illegal" im/migrants have a right to health? Engaging ethical theory as social practice at a Tel Aviv open clinic.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Med Anthropol Q. 2011 Sep;25(3):303-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01163.x.

Abstract

As the notion of a "right to health" gains influence, it is increasingly deployed in ways that are diverse, contextually variable, and at times logically inconsistent. Drawing on extended fieldwork at an Israeli human rights organization that advocates for "illegal" migrants and other vulnerable groups, this article contends that medical anthropologists cannot simply rally behind this right. Instead, we must take it as an object of ethnographic analysis and explore bow it is invoked, debated, and resisted in specific contexts. Critical ethnographies of right to health discourse and practice can enlighten us, and help us enlighten scholars in other fields, to the complexity, messiness, and "mushiness" (Sen 2009) of this right, especially in the context of advocacy on unauthorized im/migrants' behalf. It can also deepen understanding of the complicated and sometimes tense relationships among human rights, humanitarianism, and other contemporary idioms of social justice mobilization, especially in the health domain.

摘要

随着“健康权”概念的影响力不断增强,它被越来越多地以多样化的方式、具有语境差异的方式,以及有时在逻辑上不一致的方式来运用。本文通过对一家以色列人权组织的实地调查,该组织为“非法”移民和其他弱势群体争取权利。本文认为,医学人类学家不能简单地支持这项权利。相反,我们必须将其作为民族志分析的对象,并探讨它在特定背景下是如何被援引、争论和抵制的。对健康权话语和实践的批判性民族志研究可以使我们,也可以帮助我们向其他领域的学者阐明,这项权利,尤其是在为未经授权的移民代言的情况下,是复杂的、混乱的,甚至是“模糊的”(Sen 2009)。它还可以加深对人权、人道主义和其他当代社会正义动员话语之间复杂且有时紧张的关系的理解,尤其是在健康领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验