Institute for Ageing and Health, The Human Nutrition Research Centre, William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Br J Nutr. 2012 Jun;107(12):1833-44. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511005101. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Reducing the prevalence of fat-rich, energy-dense diets is a public health priority. The present parallel-designed randomised study compared three interventions aimed to increase intakes of low-fat starchy foods and to reduce fat intakes among 589 individuals from 169 families in the Family Food and Health Project (FFHP). Intervention A was education only, intervention B provided 'cook and eat' sessions only, whereas intervention C included personalised goal setting, 'cook and eat' and education. Diet was assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2) and 18 months (T3) post-intervention. Retention rates were 75 % at T1, 63 % at T2 and 40 % at T3. ANCOVA (baseline intake as covariate) was assessed between intervention differences at T1, T2 and T3. At T1, individuals in intervention C consumed less fat (P = 0·02) and more total carbohydrate (P = 0·001), starch (P = 0·04) vitamin C (P = 0·002) and NSP (P = 0·01) than those in intervention A. Whereas similar dietary intakes were reported across interventions at T2, participants in intervention C had less energy-dense diets that contained more NSP and vitamin C at T3 than intervention A (P < 0·0001, P = 0·002 and P = 0·01, respectively). Across all intervention groups, the more socially deprived participants in the FFHP (n 119) consumed less fat (P = 0·01) and more total carbohydrate (P = 0·02) at T2 than the least socially deprived (n 240). These data demonstrate the importance of personalised goal setting to translate knowledge and practical cooking skills into healthier food choices, suggesting that low-fat starchy food-focused interventions may be effective in reducing fat intake.
减少富含脂肪、高热量饮食的流行是公共卫生的重点。本平行设计的随机研究比较了三种干预措施,目的是增加低脂肪淀粉类食物的摄入量,并减少家庭食品与健康项目(FFHP)中 169 个家庭的 589 名个体的脂肪摄入量。干预 A 仅进行教育,干预 B 仅提供“烹饪和进食”课程,而干预 C 则包括个性化目标设定、“烹饪和进食”以及教育。在干预前(T0)和干预后 3 个月(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 18 个月(T3)评估饮食。保留率在 T1 时为 75%,在 T2 时为 63%,在 T3 时为 40%。ANCOVA(以基线摄入量为协变量)在 T1、T2 和 T3 时评估干预差异。在 T1 时,干预 C 中的个体摄入的脂肪较少(P=0·02),总碳水化合物较多(P=0·001)、淀粉(P=0·04)、维生素 C(P=0·002)和非淀粉多糖(P=0·01)比干预 A 中的个体多。而在 T2 时,各干预组的饮食摄入量相似,但在 T3 时,干预 C 的个体摄入的能量更密集的饮食,其中非淀粉多糖和维生素 C 较多(P<0·0001,P=0·002 和 P=0·01)比干预 A(P<0·0001,P=0·002 和 P=0·01)。在所有干预组中,FFHP 中社会地位较低的 119 名参与者在 T2 时摄入的脂肪较少(P=0·01),总碳水化合物较多(P=0·02),而社会地位最低的 240 名参与者则较少。这些数据表明,个性化目标设定对于将知识和实际烹饪技能转化为更健康的食物选择非常重要,这表明以低脂肪淀粉类食物为重点的干预措施可能有效减少脂肪摄入量。