Schumacker P T, Cain S M
Intensive Care Med. 1987;13(4):223-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00265110.
In healthy tissues, decreases in oxygen delivery (QO2 = cardiac output X arterial O2 content) do not lower oxygen consumption (VO2) because tissue O2 extraction increases proportionately. When delivery is reduced below a critical threshold, VO2 falls because tissue extraction exceeds a critical threshold, and cannot compensate for the reduction in delivery. In the adult respiratory distress syndrome and perhaps in septicemia, tissue extraction capacity is impaired, leading to O2 supply dependency despite normal or increased overall delivery. This pathologic supply dependency could be caused by a loss in autoregulatory capacity, by disrupted blood flow distribution secondary to peripheral microembolization, or to other factors interfering with efficient tissue distribution of QO2 with respect to VO2. Alternatively, the increased VO2 may be consumed in biochemical pathways not associated with ATP production, or in the production of oxygen radicals or hydrogen peroxide. To the extent this abnormal dependence of VO2 on QO2 reflects tissue hypoxia, clinical interventions which decrease systemic delivery should be evaluated with regard to possible deleterious effects on organ system function.
在健康组织中,氧输送量(QO2 = 心输出量×动脉血氧含量)降低时,氧消耗量(VO2)并不会降低,因为组织对氧的摄取会相应增加。当输送量降至临界阈值以下时,VO2会下降,因为组织摄取超过了临界阈值,无法补偿输送量的减少。在成人呼吸窘迫综合征以及可能在败血症中,组织摄取能力受损,尽管总体输送量正常或增加,仍会导致氧供应依赖。这种病理性供应依赖可能是由于自动调节能力丧失、外周微栓塞继发的血流分布紊乱,或其他干扰QO2相对于VO2有效组织分布的因素所致。或者,增加的VO2可能消耗在与ATP产生无关的生化途径中,或消耗在氧自由基或过氧化氢的产生中。就VO2对QO2的这种异常依赖反映组织缺氧的程度而言,应评估降低全身输送量的临床干预措施对器官系统功能可能产生的有害影响。