Department of Epidemiology, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 19;11:349. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-349.
Depression and diminished health status are common in adults with diabetes, but few studies have investigated associations with socio-economic environment. The objective of this manuscript was to evaluate the relationship between neighborhood-level SES and health status and depression.
Individual-level data on 1010 participants at baseline in Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes), a trial of long-term weight loss among adults with type 2 diabetes, were linked to neighborhood-level SES (% living below poverty) from the 2000 US Census (tracts). Dependent variables included depression (Beck Inventory), and health status (Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36) scale). Multi-level regression models were used to account simultaneously for individual-level age, sex, race, education, personal yearly income and neighborhood-level SES.
Overall, the % living in poverty in the participants' neighborhoods varied, mean =11% (range 0-67%). Compared to their counterparts in the lowest tertile of neighborhood poverty (least poverty), those in the highest tertile (most poverty) had significantly lower scores on the role-limitations(physical), role limitations(emotional), physical functioning, social functioning, mental health, and vitality sub-scales of the SF-36 scale. When evaluating SF-36 composite scores, those living in neighborhoods with more poverty had significantly lower scores on the physical health (beta-coefficient [beta]= -1.90 units, 95% CI: -3.40,-0.039), mental health (beta= -2.92 units, -4.31,-1.53) and global health (beta= -2.77 units, -4.21,-1.33) composite scores.
In this selected group of weight loss trial participants, lower neighborhood SES was significantly associated with poorer health status. Whether these associations might influence response to the Look AHEAD weight loss intervention requires further investigation.
抑郁和健康状况下降在患有糖尿病的成年人中很常见,但很少有研究调查社会经济环境与这些问题的关联。本文的目的是评估社区社会经济地位与健康状况和抑郁之间的关系。
在 LOOK AHEAD(糖尿病中的健康行动)试验中,对 1010 名 2 型糖尿病成人的基线个体数据进行了分析,该试验是一项长期减肥试验,将个人层面的数据与 2000 年美国人口普查的社区社会经济地位(生活在贫困线以下的比例)进行了关联(普查区)。因变量包括抑郁(贝克量表)和健康状况(医疗结果研究(SF-36)量表)。多水平回归模型同时考虑了个体层面的年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、个人年收入和社区社会经济地位。
参与者社区的贫困比例差异较大,平均为 11%(范围为 0-67%)。与社区贫困程度最低三分位数(贫困程度最低)的参与者相比,贫困程度最高三分位数(贫困程度最高)的参与者在 SF-36 量表的角色限制(身体)、角色限制(情感)、身体功能、社会功能、心理健康和活力子量表的得分明显较低。在评估 SF-36 综合评分时,生活在贫困社区的人在身体健康(β系数[β]=-1.90 单位,95%置信区间:-3.40,-0.039)、心理健康(β=-2.92 单位,-4.31,-1.53)和全球健康(β=-2.77 单位,-4.21,-1.33)的综合评分明显较低。
在这个减肥试验参与者的选择组中,较低的社区社会经济地位与较差的健康状况显著相关。这些关联是否会影响 LOOK AHEAD 减肥干预的反应需要进一步研究。