• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模扇区效应在联想识别过程中的时间进程。

Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2012 May;64(3):127-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.11.001
PMID:22197797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3259266/
Abstract

We investigated the time course of associative recognition using the response signal procedure, whereby a stimulus is presented and followed after a variable lag by a signal indicating that an immediate response is required. More specifically, we examined the effects of associative fan (the number of associations that an item has with other items in memory) on speed-accuracy tradeoff functions obtained in a previous response signal experiment involving briefly studied materials and in a new experiment involving well-learned materials. High fan lowered asymptotic accuracy or the rate of rise in accuracy across lags, or both. We developed an Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) model for the response signal procedure to explain these effects. The model assumes that high fan results in weak associative activation that slows memory retrieval, thereby decreasing the probability that retrieval finishes in time and producing a speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The ACT-R model provided an excellent account of the data, yielding quantitative fits that were as good as those of the best descriptive model for response signal data.

摘要

我们使用反应信号程序研究了联想识别的时间进程,其中呈现一个刺激,然后在一个可变的延迟后出现一个信号,表示需要立即做出反应。更具体地说,我们研究了联想风扇(一个项目与记忆中其他项目的关联数量)对速度-准确性权衡函数的影响,这些函数是在之前涉及短暂学习材料的反应信号实验和新的涉及熟练学习材料的实验中获得的。高风扇降低了渐近准确性或准确性在延迟中的上升速度,或者两者都降低了。我们为反应信号程序开发了一个自适应思维控制-理性(ACT-R)模型来解释这些影响。该模型假设,高风扇导致弱联想激活,从而减缓记忆检索,从而降低检索及时完成的概率,并产生速度-准确性权衡函数。ACT-R 模型对数据提供了极好的解释,产生的定量拟合与反应信号数据的最佳描述模型一样好。

相似文献

1
Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition.建模扇区效应在联想识别过程中的时间进程。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 May;64(3):127-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
2
Dynamic retrieval of events and associations from memory: An integrated account of item and associative recognition.从记忆中动态检索事件与关联:项目与关联识别的综合阐释
Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov;131(6):1297-1336. doi: 10.1037/rev0000486. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.连续回忆与联想识别中的单元熟悉度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):843-63. doi: 10.1037/a0019755.
4
The neural correlates of competition during memory retrieval are modulated by attention to the cues.在记忆检索过程中,竞争的神经相关性受到对线索的注意力的调节。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
5
Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory.年龄和智商对项目和联想记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):464-87. doi: 10.1037/a0023810.
6
Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval.基于熟悉度的联想检索的神经关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):3019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
7
Stages of processing in associative recognition: evidence from behavior, EEG, and classification.联想识别中的加工阶段:来自行为、脑电图和分类的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2151-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00457. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
8
The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: evidence from event-related potentials.单元化对熟悉度和回忆过程在关联识别记忆中贡献的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Mar;95(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
9
Memory asymmetry of forward and backward associations in recognition tasks.在识别任务中,前后联想的记忆不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):253-69. doi: 10.1037/a0028875. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
10
An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval.三个皮质区域的信息处理模型:情景记忆检索中的证据
Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A whole-task brain model of associative recognition that accounts for human behavior and neuroimaging data.一个全任务大脑联想识别模型,可以解释人类行为和神经影像学数据。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Sep 8;19(9):e1011427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011427. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Three levels at which the user's cognition can be represented in artificial intelligence.在人工智能中可以表示用户认知的三个层次。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jan 13;5:1092053. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1092053. eCollection 2022.
3
Capturing Dynamic Performance in a Cognitive Model: Estimating ACT-R Memory Parameters With the Linear Ballistic Accumulator.在认知模型中捕捉动态性能:用线性弹道累积器估计 ACT-R 记忆参数。
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;14(4):889-903. doi: 10.1111/tops.12614. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.协议吸引中的层次结构和记忆机制。
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0232163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232163. eCollection 2020.
5
Core body temperature speeds up temporal processing and choice behavior under deadlines.核心体温在截止日期下加快了时间处理和选择行为。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 11;9(1):10053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46073-3.
6
Fast and slow errors: Logistic regression to identify patterns in accuracy-response time relationships.快与慢错误:逻辑回归分析在准确性-反应时关系中的模式识别。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2378-2389. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1110-z.
7
The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.记忆过程的常见时间进程揭示。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1463-1474. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774526. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Characterizing synchrony patterns across cognitive task stages of associative recognition memory.描述联想识别记忆认知任务阶段的同步模式。
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(8):2759-2769. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13817. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Does prediction error drive one-shot declarative learning?预测误差会驱动一次性陈述性学习吗?
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:149-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.001.
10
The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg's method.加工阶段的发现:斯滕伯格方法的扩展。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Oct;123(5):481-509. doi: 10.1037/rev0000030. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The locus of the Gratton effect in picture-word interference.图片-单词干扰中格拉顿效应的轨迹
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):168-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01069.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
2
Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?优化检索练习的时间表以实现持久和高效的学习:要达到多少才算足够?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):283-302. doi: 10.1037/a0023956.
3
Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.短期记忆扫描被视为基于范例的分类。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):280-315. doi: 10.1037/a0022494.
4
A memory-based model of Hick's law.基于记忆的希克定律模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 May;62(3):193-222. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.11.001.
5
List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory.列表长度与即时记忆中的识别过程。
Mem Cognit. 1976 Jan;4(1):16-30. doi: 10.3758/BF03213250.
6
Comparing time-accuracy curves: beyond goodness-of-fit measures.比较时间-准确性曲线:超越拟合优度度量
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):190-203. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.190.
7
Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.模拟衰老对二选一任务的影响:反应信号和反应时间数据
Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):900-16. doi: 10.1037/a0013930.
8
Model evaluation using grouped or individual data.使用分组数据或个体数据进行模型评估。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):692-712. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.692.
9
Recognition memory: a review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them.识别记忆:关键研究结果综述及相关综合理论
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Dec;57(4):335-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 May 15.
10
A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval.对记忆的合理解释预测,在控制性检索过程中左前额叶会被激活。
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Nov;18(11):2674-85. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn027. Epub 2008 Mar 4.