Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Mar;18(2):375-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001810. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Serial assessments are commonplace in neuropsychological practice and used to document cognitive trajectory for many clinical conditions. However, true change scores may be distorted by measurement error, repeated exposure to the assessment instrument, or person variables. The present study provides reliable change indices (RCI) for the Boston Naming Test, derived from a sample of 844 cognitively normal adults aged 56 years and older. All participants were retested between 9 and 24 months after their baseline exam. Results showed that a 4-point decline during a 9-15 month retest period or a 6-point decline during a 16-24 month retest period represents reliable change. These cutoff values were further characterized as a function of a person's age and family history of dementia. These findings may help clinicians and researchers to characterize with greater precision the temporal changes in confrontation naming ability.
序列评估在神经心理学实践中很常见,用于记录许多临床情况的认知轨迹。然而,真实的变化分数可能会受到测量误差、对评估工具的重复接触或个体变量的影响而扭曲。本研究为波士顿命名测试提供了可靠的变化指标(RCI),该测试来自 844 名认知正常的 56 岁及以上成年人的样本。所有参与者在基线检查后 9 至 24 个月内进行了重新测试。结果表明,在 9-15 个月的重测期间下降 4 分,或在 16-24 个月的重测期间下降 6 分,代表可靠的变化。这些临界值进一步根据一个人的年龄和痴呆家族史进行了特征描述。这些发现可能有助于临床医生和研究人员更精确地描述命名能力在时间上的变化。