• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对威胁性的社会行为表现出更高的记忆能力。

Children show heightened memory for threatening social actions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 May;112(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.003
PMID:22284664
Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether a negativity bias in social perception extends to preschool-aged children's memory for the details of others' social actions and experiences. After learning about individuals who committed nice or mean social actions, children in Experiment 1 were more accurate at remembering who was mean compared with who was nice. In Experiment 2, children showed a memory advantage for the specific details of actions committed by mean individuals compared with nice individuals. In Experiment 3, children exhibited better memory for the details of mean actions compared with nice actions when the vignettes were presented from the perspective of the recipients instead of the perpetrators of these actions. Taken together, these findings suggest that children show heightened memory for the details of negative social actions over positive social actions. Such a memory bias may be advantageous in helping children to predict potentially threatening situations in the future.

摘要

三项实验研究了在社会认知中是否存在负面偏见,这种偏见是否会延伸到学龄前儿童对他人社会行为和经历细节的记忆中。在了解了做出友善或不友善社会行为的个体之后,实验 1 中的儿童在记住谁不友善时比记住谁友善时更准确。在实验 2 中,与友善的个体相比,儿童对不友善个体所做行为的具体细节表现出记忆优势。在实验 3 中,当从行为接受者的角度而不是行为实施者的角度呈现小插曲时,儿童对不友善行为的细节表现出更好的记忆,而对友善行为的细节则表现出较差的记忆。这些发现表明,儿童对负面社会行为的细节比正面社会行为的细节表现出更高的记忆能力。这种记忆偏差可能有助于儿童预测未来潜在的威胁情况。

相似文献

1
Children show heightened memory for threatening social actions.儿童对威胁性的社会行为表现出更高的记忆能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 May;112(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
2
Children's sociolinguistic evaluations of nice foreigners and mean Americans.儿童对友善的外国人和刻薄的美国人的社会语言评价。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Apr;49(4):655-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028740. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
3
Treating another's actions as one's own: children's memory of and learning from joint activity.将他人的行为视为自己的行为:儿童对联合活动的记忆及从中学习
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):1003-18. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1003.
4
Memory for "mean" over "nice": the influence of threat on children's face memory.记住“刻薄”而非“友善”:威胁对儿童面部记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):775-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
5
Social perception in children with intellectual disabilities: the interpretation of benign and hostile intentions.智力残疾儿童的社会感知:对善意和敌意意图的解读。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):168-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01240.x. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
6
Threat perception bias in nonreferred, socially anxious children.未被转诊的社交焦虑儿童的威胁感知偏差。
J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Sep;29(3):348-59. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_6.
7
You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers.你说西红柿?与陌生人相比,亲密伴侣间的协作记忆会导致更多错误记忆。
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):262-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801491.
8
Remembering specific episodes of a scripted event.记住有剧本事件的特定情节。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Aug;73(4):266-88. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2507.
9
The effects of verbal information on children's fear beliefs about social situations.言语信息对儿童关于社交情境的恐惧信念的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jan;45(1):21-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
10
Young children overimitate in third-party contexts.幼儿在第三方情境中过度模仿。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 May;112(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's suggestibility for neutral arbitrary actions in the context of norm violations.儿童在违反规范背景下对中性任意行为的易受暗示性。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286241. eCollection 2023.
2
Time heals all wounds? Naïve theories about the fading of affect associated with autobiographical events.时间能治愈一切创伤?关于与自传体事件相关的情感消退的天真理论。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1715-1728. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01426-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
How do topics and emotions develop in elementary school children? A text mining perspective based on free-writing text over 6 years.
小学儿童的话题和情感是如何发展的?基于6年自由写作文本的文本挖掘视角。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1109126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109126. eCollection 2023.
4
Differentiating Between Us & Them: Reduced In-Group Bias as a Novel Mechanism Linking Childhood Violence Exposure with Internalizing Psychopathology.区分“我们”与“他们”:减少内群体偏见作为将儿童期暴力暴露与内化性精神病理学联系起来的新机制。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Jul;51(7):961-975. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01035-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Children's Informant Judgments and Recall of Valenced Facts at a Science Center.儿童在科学中心作为信息提供者的判断及对有价值事实的回忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 16;12:659633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659633. eCollection 2021.
6
Source memory and social exchange in young children.儿童的源记忆和社会交往。
Cogn Process. 2021 Aug;22(3):529-537. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01028-3. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Traits or Circumstances? Children's Explanations of Positive and Negative Behavioral Outcomes.特质还是环境?儿童对积极和消极行为结果的解释。
Cogn Dev. 2021 Apr-Jun;58. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101019. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
8
Does Internet Use Affect Individuals' Medical Service Satisfaction? Evidence from China.互联网使用会影响个人的医疗服务满意度吗?来自中国的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;8(2):81. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020081.
9
How information about what is "healthy" versus "unhealthy" impacts children's consumption of otherwise identical foods.什么样的食物是“健康的”,什么样的食物是“不健康的”,这些信息会如何影响儿童对原本相同食物的消费。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Dec;148(12):2091-2103. doi: 10.1037/xge0000588. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Do Infants in the First Year of Life Expect Equal Resource Allocations?一岁以内的婴儿能期望得到平等的资源分配吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00116. eCollection 2019.