Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Ambio. 2012;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):78-89. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0243-4.
Deforestation is the second largest anthropogenic source of carbon dioxide emissions and options for its reduction are integral to climate policy. In addition to providing potentially low cost and near-term options for reducing global carbon emissions, reducing deforestation also could support biodiversity conservation. However, current understanding of the potential benefits to biodiversity from forest carbon offset programs is limited. We compile spatial data on global forest carbon, biodiversity, deforestation rates, and the opportunity cost of land to examine biodiversity conservation benefits from an international program to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation. Our results indicate limited geographic overlap between the least-cost areas for retaining forest carbon and protecting biodiversity. Therefore, carbon-focused policies will likely generate substantially lower benefits to biodiversity than a more biodiversity-focused policy could achieve. These results highlight the need to systematically consider co-benefits, such as biodiversity in the design and implementation of forest conservation programs to support international climate policy.
森林砍伐是人为二氧化碳排放的第二大来源,减少森林砍伐的方法是气候政策的重要组成部分。除了为减少全球碳排放提供潜在低成本和近期选择外,减少森林砍伐还有助于保护生物多样性。然而,目前对于森林碳补偿计划对生物多样性的潜在益处的理解有限。我们编制了关于全球森林碳、生物多样性、森林砍伐率以及土地机会成本的空间数据,以研究减少森林砍伐导致的碳排放的国际计划对生物多样性保护的益处。我们的结果表明,保留森林碳和保护生物多样性的最低成本区域之间的地理重叠有限。因此,与更注重生物多样性的政策相比,以碳为重点的政策对生物多样性的益处可能要低得多。这些结果突出表明,在设计和实施森林保护计划以支持国际气候政策时,需要系统地考虑生物多样性等共同利益。