Hunt Geoffrey, Moloney Molly, Fazio Adam
Institute for Scientific Analysis, Alameda, California, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus.
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2011 Dec 21;28(5-6):433-452. doi: 10.2478/v10199-011-0040-1.
Qualitative research is often conceptualized as inherently small-scale research, primarily conducted by a lone researcher enmeshed in extensive and long-term fieldwork or involving in-depth interviews with a small sample of 20 to 30 participants. In the study of illicit drugs, traditionally this has often been in the form of ethnographies of drug-using subcultures. Such small-scale projects have produced important interpretive scholarship that focuses on the culture and meaning of drug use in situated, embodied contexts. Larger-scale projects are often assumed to be solely the domain of quantitative researchers, using formalistic survey methods and descriptive or explanatory models.In this paper, however, we will discuss qualitative research done on a comparatively larger scale-with in-depth qualitative interviews with hundreds of young drug users. Although this work incorporates some quantitative elements into the design, data collection, and analysis, the qualitative dimension and approach has nevertheless remained central. Larger-scale qualitative research shares some of the challenges and promises of smaller-scale qualitative work including understanding drug consumption from an emic perspective, locating hard-to-reach populations, developing rapport with respondents, generating thick descriptions and a rich analysis, and examining the wider socio-cultural context as a central feature. However, there are additional challenges specific to the scale of qualitative research, which include data management, data overload and problems of handling large-scale data sets, time constraints in coding and analyzing data, and personnel issues including training, organizing and mentoring large research teams. Yet large samples can prove to be essential for enabling researchers to conduct comparative research, whether that be cross-national research within a wider European perspective undertaken by different teams or cross-cultural research looking at internal divisions and differences within diverse communities and cultures.
定性研究通常被概念化为本质上是小规模研究,主要由一名独自的研究人员进行,该研究人员沉浸于广泛且长期的实地调查中,或者涉及对20至30名参与者的小样本进行深度访谈。在非法药物研究中,传统上这通常采用吸毒亚文化民族志的形式。这类小规模项目产生了重要的诠释性学术成果,其聚焦于特定情境下、具体体现中的吸毒文化和意义。大规模项目通常被认为完全是定量研究人员的领域,采用形式化的调查方法以及描述性或解释性模型。然而,在本文中,我们将讨论在相对更大规模上开展的定性研究——对数百名年轻吸毒者进行深度定性访谈。尽管这项工作在设计、数据收集和分析中纳入了一些定量元素,但定性维度和方法仍然是核心。大规模定性研究与小规模定性研究有着一些共同的挑战和前景,包括从主位视角理解药物消费、定位难以接触到的人群、与受访者建立融洽关系、生成详细描述和丰富分析,以及将更广泛的社会文化背景作为核心特征进行考察。然而,定性研究规模本身还存在其他特定挑战,包括数据管理、数据过载以及处理大规模数据集的问题、编码和分析数据时的时间限制,还有人员问题,包括培训、组织和指导大型研究团队。然而,大样本对于研究人员进行比较研究可能至关重要,无论是不同团队在更广泛欧洲视角下进行的跨国研究,还是考察不同社区和文化内部差异和分歧的跨文化研究。