• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者神经康复体验问卷的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the neurorehabilitation experience questionnaire for inpatients.

机构信息

Surrey Community Health, Leatherhead, UK.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Sep;26(7):834-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968311431962. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/1545968311431962
PMID:22328684
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered measures of the inpatient neurorehabilitation experience are needed to assess services.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire (NREQ) to assess whether neurorehabilitation inpatients experience service elements important to them.

METHODS

Based on the themes established in prior qualitative research, adopting questions from established inventories and using a literature review, a draft version of the NREQ was generated. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 9 patients and 26 staff from neurological rehabilitation units to establish face validity. Then, 70 patients were recruited to complete the NREQ to ascertain reliability (internal and test-retest) and concurrent validity.

RESULTS

On the basis of the face validity testing, several modifications were made to the draft version of the NREQ. Subsequently, internal reliability (time 1 α = .76, time 2 α = .80), test retest reliability (r = 0.70), and concurrent validity (r = 0.32 and r = 0.56) were established for the revised version. Whereas responses were associated with positive mood (r = 0.30), they appeared not to be influenced by negative mood, age, education, length of stay, sex, functional independence, or whether a participant had been a patient on a unit previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary validation of the NREQ suggests promise for use with its target population.

摘要

背景

需要以患者为中心的住院神经康复体验措施来评估服务。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种有效的、可靠的神经康复体验问卷(NREQ),以评估神经康复住院患者是否体验到对他们重要的服务要素。

方法

基于先前定性研究中确定的主题,采用来自现有量表的问题,并进行文献复习,生成了 NREQ 的草案。通过焦点小组和访谈,对 9 名患者和 26 名神经康复病房工作人员进行了访谈,以确定其表面效度。然后,招募了 70 名患者完成 NREQ,以确定可靠性(内部和重测)和同时效度。

结果

根据表面有效性测试,对 NREQ 的草案进行了一些修改。随后,内部信度(时间 1α=.76,时间 2α=.80)、重测信度(r=0.70)和修正版的同时效度(r=0.32 和 r=0.56)得到了验证。虽然患者的回答与积极情绪相关(r=0.30),但似乎不受负面情绪、年龄、教育程度、住院时间、性别、功能独立性或患者是否曾在某一病房住院的影响。

结论

NREQ 的初步验证表明,它有望在目标人群中使用。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the neurorehabilitation experience questionnaire for inpatients.住院患者神经康复体验问卷的信度和效度。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Sep;26(7):834-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968311431962. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire: measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment.修订版偏头痛患者感知问卷的验证:评估急性偏头痛治疗的满意度
Headache. 2006 Feb;46(2):240-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00289.x.
4
[Validity and reliability of a new questionnaire on patient satisfaction in rehabilitative therapy].[一份关于康复治疗中患者满意度的新问卷的效度和信度]
Minerva Med. 1998 Mar;89(3):57-64.
5
Mental health recovery for psychiatric inpatient services: perceived importance of the elements of recovery.精神科住院服务中的心理健康康复:康复要素的感知重要性
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;22(2):39-48.
6
Self-administration and interviewer-administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies.德国慢性呼吸问卷的自我管理和访谈者管理:两项随机研究中的工具开发及效度与信度评估
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jan 8;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-1.
7
Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.住院患者所体验到的情感关怀:一种测量工具的开发与测试
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1069-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02586.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
8
The Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale: the development and initial evaluation of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care from the patient perspective.糖尿病连续性照护量表:一份从患者角度衡量照护连续性的问卷的开发与初步评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):475-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00517.x.
9
The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity.与儿童健康问卷-CF87相比,脊柱侧弯研究学会-22r患者问卷在青少年脊柱畸形中的信度和同时效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 15;32(16):1778-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180dc9bb2.
10
Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation.一种用于评估感知参与度的新问卷的开发与评估
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Sep;21(9):833-45. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077278.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish reliability and validity of Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire.《神经康复体验问卷》的土耳其语信效度研究
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Jun 2;71(4):e20241781. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241781. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review.成人住院患者自我报告的体验指标:一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Nov 23;2024:5166392. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5166392. eCollection 2024.
3
Addressing inactivity after stroke: The Collaborative Rehabilitation in Acute Stroke (CREATE) study.
针对卒中后不活动问题:协作性急性卒中康复研究(CREATE 研究)。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Aug;16(6):669-682. doi: 10.1177/1747493020969367. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.