Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病问卷的验证和诊断准确性。

Validation and diagnostic accuracy of the Alzheimer's questionnaire.

机构信息

Cleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, 10515 W. Santa Fe Drive, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):396-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs008. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

accurately identifying individuals with cognitive impairment is difficult. Given the time constraints that many clinicians face, assessment of cognitive status is often not undertaken. The intent of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Alzheimer's questionnaire (AQ) in identifying individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD.

METHODS

utilising a case-control design, 300 [100 AD, 100 MCI, 100 cognitively normal (CN)] older adults between the ages of 53 and 93 from a neurology practice and a brain donation programme had the AQ administered to an informant. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through receiver-operating characteristic analysis, which yielded sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

the AQ demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI [89.00 (81.20-94.40)]; [91.00 (83.60-65.80)] and AD [99.00 (94.60-100.00)]; [96.00 (90.10-98.90)]. AUC values also indicated high diagnostic accuracy for both MCI [0.95 (0.91-0.97)] and AD [0.99 (0.96-1.00)]. Internal consistency of the AQ was also high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

the AQ is a valid informant-based instrument for identifying cognitive impairment, which could be easily implemented in a clinician's practice. It has high sensitivity and specificity in detecting both MCI and AD and allows clinicians to quickly and accurately assess individuals with reported cognitive problems.

摘要

背景

准确识别认知障碍个体具有一定难度。鉴于许多临床医生面临的时间限制,认知状态评估往往无法进行。本研究旨在确定阿尔茨海默病问卷(AQ)在识别轻度认知障碍(MCI)和 AD 个体中的诊断准确性。

方法

利用病例对照设计,从神经病学实践和脑捐赠计划中招募了 300 名年龄在 53 至 93 岁之间的老年人(100 名 AD、100 名 MCI、100 名认知正常(CN)),由知情人对他们进行 AQ 测试。通过受试者工作特征分析评估诊断准确性,得出灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

AQ 对 MCI 的检测具有较高的灵敏度和特异性[89.00(81.20-94.40)];[91.00(83.60-65.80)]和 AD [99.00(94.60-100.00)];[96.00(90.10-98.90)]。AUC 值也表明 MCI 的诊断准确性较高[0.95(0.91-0.97)]和 AD [0.99(0.96-1.00)]。AQ 的内部一致性也很高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.89)。

结论

AQ 是一种有效的基于知情人的认知障碍识别工具,可在临床医生的实践中轻松实施。它在检测 MCI 和 AD 方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,并使临床医生能够快速准确地评估报告有认知问题的个体。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Neuropathologic validation of the Alzheimer's Questionnaire.阿尔茨海默病问卷的神经病理学验证。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Nov;34(11):2905-2909. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02222-9. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Construction and Standardization of Dementia Arabic Scale.痴呆阿拉伯语量表的构建与标准化
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Mar 3;17:721-729. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S291392. eCollection 2021.
10
Informant Personality Is Associated With Ratings of Memory Problems in Older Adults.信息提供者人格与老年人记忆问题评定有关。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 Nov;33(7):479-489. doi: 10.1177/1533317518790540. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Should older adults be screened for dementia?老年人应该接受痴呆症筛查吗?
Alzheimers Dement. 2006 Apr;2(2):76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2006.02.005.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验