Picardal Flynn
School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana UniversityBloomington, IN, USA.
Front Microbiol. 2012 Mar 29;3:112. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00112. eCollection 2012.
Microbial Fe(II) oxidation using [Formula: see text] as the terminal electron acceptor [nitrate-dependent Fe(II) oxidation, NDFO] has been studied for over 15 years. Although there are reports of autotrophic isolates and stable enrichments, many of the bacteria capable of NDFO are known organotrophic [Formula: see text]-reducers that require the presence of an organic, primary substrate, e.g., acetate, for significant amounts of Fe(II) oxidation. Although the thermodynamics of Fe(II) oxidation are favorable when coupled to either [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] reduction, the kinetics of abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by [Formula: see text] are relatively slow except under special conditions. NDFO is typically studied in batch cultures containing millimolar concentrations of Fe(II), [Formula: see text], and the primary substrate. In such systems, [Formula: see text] is often observed to accumulate in culture media during Fe(II) oxidation. Compared to [Formula: see text] abiotic reactions of biogenic [Formula: see text] and Fe(II) are relatively rapid. The kinetics and reaction pathways of Fe(II) oxidation by [Formula: see text] are strongly affected by medium composition and pH, reactant concentration, and the presence of Fe(II)-sorptive surfaces, e.g., Fe(III) oxyhydroxides and cellular surfaces. In batch cultures, the combination of abiotic and microbial Fe(II) oxidation can alter product distribution and, more importantly, results in the formation of intracellular precipitates and extracellular Fe(III) oxyhydroxide encrustations that apparently limit further cell growth and Fe(II) oxidation. Unless steps are taken to minimize or account for potential abiotic reactions, results of microbial NDFO studies can be obfuscated by artifacts of the chosen experimental conditions, the use of inappropriate analytical methods, and the resulting uncertainties about the relative importance of abiotic and microbial reactions. In this manuscript, abiotic reactions of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with aqueous Fe(2+), chelated Fe(II), and solid-phase Fe(II) are reviewed along with factors that can influence overall NDFO reaction rates in microbial systems. In addition, the use of low substrate concentrations, continuous-flow systems, and experimental protocols that minimize experimental artifacts and reduce the potential for under- or overestimation of microbial NDFO rates are discussed.
以[化学式:见原文]作为末端电子受体的微生物亚铁氧化作用(硝酸盐依赖型亚铁氧化,NDFO)已被研究了15年多。尽管有自养分离株和稳定富集培养物的报道,但许多能够进行NDFO的细菌是已知的有机营养型[化学式:见原文]还原菌,它们需要存在有机初级底物,如乙酸盐,才能进行大量的亚铁氧化。尽管亚铁氧化与[化学式:见原文]或[化学式:见原文]还原耦合时的热力学是有利的,但除特殊条件外,[化学式:见原文]对非生物亚铁氧化的动力学相对较慢。NDFO通常在含有毫摩尔浓度的亚铁、[化学式:见原文]和初级底物的分批培养物中进行研究。在这样的系统中,在亚铁氧化过程中,[化学式:见原文]常常会在培养基中积累。与[化学式:见原文]相比,生物源[化学式:见原文]和亚铁的非生物反应相对较快。[化学式:见原文]对亚铁氧化的动力学和反应途径受到培养基组成和pH值、反应物浓度以及亚铁吸附表面(如氢氧化铁和细胞表面)的存在的强烈影响。在分批培养中,非生物和微生物亚铁氧化的结合可以改变产物分布,更重要的是,会导致细胞内沉淀和细胞外氢氧化铁结壳的形成,这显然会限制进一步的细胞生长和亚铁氧化。除非采取措施尽量减少或考虑潜在的非生物反应,否则微生物NDFO研究的结果可能会因所选实验条件的人为因素、使用不适当的分析方法以及由此产生的关于非生物和微生物反应相对重要性的不确定性而变得模糊不清。在本手稿中,回顾了[化学式:见原文]和[化学式:见原文]与水溶液中的亚铁、螯合亚铁和固相亚铁的非生物反应,以及可能影响微生物系统中总体NDFO反应速率的因素。此外,还讨论了使用低底物浓度、连续流系统以及尽量减少实验人为因素并降低微生物NDFO速率低估或高估可能性的实验方案。