Poultney Christopher S, Greenfield Alex, Bonneau Richard
Department of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Methods Cell Biol. 2012;110:19-56. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-388403-9.00002-3.
Regulatory and signaling networks coordinate the enormously complex interactions and processes that control cellular processes (such as metabolism and cell division), coordinate response to the environment, and carry out multiple cell decisions (such as development and quorum sensing). Regulatory network inference is the process of inferring these networks, traditionally from microarray data but increasingly incorporating other measurement types such as proteomics, ChIP-seq, metabolomics, and mass cytometry. We discuss existing techniques for network inference. We review in detail our pipeline, which consists of an initial biclustering step, designed to estimate co-regulated groups; a network inference step, designed to select and parameterize likely regulatory models for the control of the co-regulated groups from the biclustering step; and a visualization and analysis step, designed to find and communicate key features of the network. Learning biological networks from even the most complete data sets is challenging; we argue that integrating new data types into the inference pipeline produces networks of increased accuracy, validity, and biological relevance.
调控网络和信号网络协调着极其复杂的相互作用和过程,这些相互作用和过程控制着细胞过程(如新陈代谢和细胞分裂)、协调对环境的反应,并做出多种细胞决策(如发育和群体感应)。调控网络推断是推断这些网络的过程,传统上是从微阵列数据进行推断,但越来越多地纳入其他测量类型,如蛋白质组学、ChIP-seq、代谢组学和质谱流式细胞术。我们讨论了现有的网络推断技术。我们详细回顾了我们的流程,该流程包括一个初始双聚类步骤,旨在估计共调控组;一个网络推断步骤,旨在从双聚类步骤中为共调控组的控制选择并参数化可能的调控模型;以及一个可视化和分析步骤,旨在发现并传达网络的关键特征。即使从最完整的数据集中学习生物网络也具有挑战性;我们认为将新的数据类型整合到推断流程中会产生准确性、有效性和生物学相关性更高的网络。