Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;33(8):1553-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3108. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
The clinical relevance of improved detection of cerebral microbleeds by using advanced-versus-conventional MR imaging techniques remains uncertain. As part of the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study, we compared whether participants whose microbleeds were only demonstrated on a high-resolution MR imaging sequence differed with respect to risk profile and risk of new microbleeds from participants whose microbleeds were also depicted on a conventional MR imaging sequence.
Two hundred participants (mean age, 79.2 years) underwent both conventional 2D T2*-weighted MR imaging and high-resolution 3D T2*-weighted MR imaging at 1.5T. Vascular risk factors, APOE allele status, and markers of small vessel disease and risk of incident microbleeds were compared for microbleed status by using logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex.
There were no significant associations between any of the factors and microbleed presence in participants whose microbleeds were only demonstrated on a high-resolution MR imaging sequence. However, the estimates in these participants were more similar to those in participants whose microbleeds were also depicted on a conventional MR imaging sequence than to those in participants without microbleeds. Moreover, significantly more participants whose microbleeds were only demonstrated on high-resolution MR imaging developed new CMBs during follow-up compared with participants without CMBs (25.0% versus 5.9%; OR, 5.98; 95% CI, 1.35-26.49).
Improved detection of microbleeds may contribute to more accurate identification of persons with underlying small-vessel pathology in the general elderly population. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings and firmly establish the role of improved detection of CMBs in the identification of persons with vasculopathy.
采用高级与常规磁共振成像技术提高脑微出血检测的临床相关性仍不确定。作为基于人群的鹿特丹扫描研究的一部分,我们比较了仅在高分辨率磁共振成像序列上显示微出血的参与者与在常规磁共振成像序列上也显示微出血的参与者在风险状况和新微出血风险方面是否存在差异。
200 名参与者(平均年龄 79.2 岁)在 1.5T 下接受了常规二维 T2*-加权磁共振成像和高分辨率三维 T2*-加权磁共振成像。使用逻辑回归模型比较了微出血状态的血管危险因素、APOE 等位基因状态以及小血管疾病和微出血事件风险的标志物,该模型调整了年龄和性别。
在仅在高分辨率磁共振成像序列上显示微出血的参与者中,没有任何因素与微出血的存在有显著关联。然而,这些参与者的估计值与在常规磁共振成像序列上也显示微出血的参与者的估计值更为相似,而与没有微出血的参与者的估计值相差较大。此外,与没有微出血的参与者相比,更多仅在高分辨率磁共振成像序列上显示微出血的参与者在随访期间出现新的 CMB(25.0%比 5.9%;OR,5.98;95%CI,1.35-26.49)。
微出血的检测改善可能有助于更准确地识别普通老年人群中存在潜在小血管病变的人。需要进一步研究来复制这些发现,并明确 CMB 检测改善在识别血管病患者中的作用。