Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Vaccine. 2012 Jun 13;30(28):4240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.044. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
The influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in 2009 created an urgent need to develop vaccines for mass immunization. To guide decisions regarding the optimal immunization dosage and schedule for adults, we evaluated two monovalent, inactivated, unadjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccines in independent, but simultaneously conducted, multi-center Phase 2 trials of identical design.
Healthy adults, stratified by age (18-64 years and ≥65 years), were randomized (1:1 allocation), in a double-blind, parallel-group design, to receive two intramuscular doses (21 days apart) of vaccine containing approximately 15 μg or 30 μg of hemagglutinin (HA). Primary endpoints were safety (reactogenicity for 8 days after each vaccination and vaccine-associated serious adverse events during the 7 month study) and immunogenicity (proportion of subjects, stratified by age, achieving a serum hemagglutination inhibition [HI] antibody titer ≥1:40 or a ≥4-fold rise in titer after a single injection of either dosage).
Both vaccines were well-tolerated. A single 15 μg dose induced HI titers ≥1:40 in 90% of younger adults (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-95%) and 81% of elderly (95% CI 71-88%) who received Sanofi-Pasteur vaccine (subsequently found to contain 24 μg HA in the standard potency assay), and in 80% of younger adults (95% CI 71-88%) and 60% of elderly (95% CI 50-70%) who received CSL vaccine. Both vaccines were significantly more immunogenic in younger compared with elderly adults by at least one endpoint measure. Increasing the dose to 30 μg raised the frequency of HI titers ≥1:40 in the elderly by approximately 10%. Higher dosage did not significantly enhance immunogenicity in younger adults and a second dose provided little additional benefit to either age group.
These trials provided evidence for policymakers that a single 15 μg dose of 2009 A/H1N1 vaccine would likely protect most U.S. adults and suggest a potential benefit of a 30 μg dose for the elderly.
2009 年的甲型 H1N1 流感大流行促使人们急需开发用于大规模免疫接种的疫苗。为了指导针对成年人的最佳免疫剂量和方案的决策,我们评估了两种单价、灭活、无佐剂的 H1N1 流感疫苗,这些疫苗在独立但同时进行的、设计相同的多中心 2 期临床试验中进行了评估。
将按年龄分层(18-64 岁和≥65 岁)的健康成年人随机(1:1 分配)分组,以双盲、平行组设计接受两次肌肉内接种(间隔 21 天),疫苗中含有约 15 μg 或 30 μg 血凝素(HA)。主要终点是安全性(每次接种后 8 天的反应原性和 7 个月研究期间与疫苗相关的严重不良事件)和免疫原性(按年龄分层,单次注射任一剂量后血清血凝抑制[HI]抗体滴度≥1:40 或滴度升高≥4 倍的受试者比例)。
两种疫苗均具有良好的耐受性。单次 15 μg 剂量可诱导圣诺菲-巴斯德疫苗(随后在标准效力测定中发现含有 24 μg HA)中 90%的年轻成年人(95%置信区间 [CI] 82-95%)和 81%的老年人(95% CI 71-88%)和 80%的年轻成年人(95% CI 71-88%)产生 HI 滴度≥1:40,而 CSL 疫苗中 60%的老年人(95% CI 50-70%)产生 HI 滴度≥1:40。通过至少一个终点测量,两种疫苗在年轻成年人中的免疫原性均明显优于老年人。将剂量增加到 30 μg 可使老年人的 HI 滴度≥1:40 的频率提高约 10%。较高的剂量并未显著增强年轻成年人的免疫原性,而第二剂对任何年龄组都没有额外的益处。
这些试验为政策制定者提供了证据,表明单次接种 15 μg 的 2009 年 A/H1N1 疫苗可能足以保护大多数美国成年人,并提示老年人可能受益于 30 μg 剂量。