• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慕尼黑肩部问卷(MSQ):一种用于肩部手术结局测量和患者安全的有效患者报告工具的开发与验证

The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery.

作者信息

Schmidutz Florian, Beirer Marc, Braunstein Volker, Bogner Viktoria, Wiedemann Ernst, Biberthaler Peter

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2012 May 18;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-6-9.

DOI:10.1186/1754-9493-6-9
PMID:22607967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3502470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires.

METHODS

A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature.

摘要

背景

肩部手术的疗效评估对于评价患者安全性和治疗效率至关重要。目前,由于大多数患者报告的自我评估工具缺乏可比性,这一评估受到了影响。因此,本研究旨在开发一种可靠的自我评估问卷,以便于对患者进行随访。该问卷还可用于计算3种成熟的评分系统,即肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)、Constant-Murley评分(CMS)以及上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)。这三种系统的主观和客观项目被浓缩成一份包含30个问题的单一问卷,并与原始问卷进行了验证。

方法

邀请我院肩部门诊的一组具有代表性的患者填写新设计的慕尼黑肩部自我评估问卷(MSQ)。同时,发放用于CONSTANT、SPADI和DASH评分自我评估的成熟问卷。通过线性回归分析比较所得结果。

结果

51名患者完成了所有问卷。结果的相关系数分别为:SPADI评分系统r = 0.91,DASH评分系统r = -0.93,CMS评分系统r = 0.94。

结论

我们开发了一种可对肩部功能进行定量自我评估的工具。它通过一份简短的30项问卷为三种最常用的肩部功能评分系统提供了兼容的数据集。该工具可供肩部外科医生有效监测其治疗的疗效、安全性和质量,并将结果与文献中已发表的数据进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddf/3502470/a911bcb74dfe/1754-9493-6-9-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddf/3502470/147a9059e613/1754-9493-6-9-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddf/3502470/a911bcb74dfe/1754-9493-6-9-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddf/3502470/147a9059e613/1754-9493-6-9-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddf/3502470/a911bcb74dfe/1754-9493-6-9-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery.慕尼黑肩部问卷(MSQ):一种用于肩部手术结局测量和患者安全的有效患者报告工具的开发与验证
Patient Saf Surg. 2012 May 18;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-6-9.
2
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)。
J Physiother. 2011;57(3):197. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70045-5.
3
Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales.开放性肩袖修复术后的结果分析。使用四种不同的肩部评估量表验证早期疗效。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(7-8):432-6. doi: 10.1007/s004020000133.
4
Comparative study of psychometric properties of three assessment tools for degenerative rotator cuff disease.三种退行性肩袖疾病评估工具的心理测量学特性比较研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Feb;33(2):277-284. doi: 10.1177/0269215518796888. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Responsiveness of two Persian-versions of shoulder outcome measures following physiotherapy intervention in patients with shoulder disorders.肩部疾病患者接受物理治疗干预后两种波斯语版本肩部结局测量指标的反应性
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2300-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1005760. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain.尼泊尔语版 DASH(手臂、肩部和手部残疾)在肩部疼痛患者中的跨文化适应性和测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 21;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1105-1.
7
Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.测量整体还是部分?上肢不同区域的手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍结局测量指标的效度、信度和反应度
J Hand Ther. 2001 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-46.
8
[Outcome analysis after open reconstruction of rotator cuff ruptures. A comparative assessment of recent evaluation procedures].[肩袖撕裂开放重建术后的结果分析。对近期评估程序的比较性评估]
Unfallchirurg. 2001 Jun;104(6):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s001130170109.
9
Nepali translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).尼泊尔语翻译、跨文化调适及肩关节痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)的测量特性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 30;14(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1285-8.
10
Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty.六种结局评估工具在全肩关节置换术中的反应性
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):391-8. doi: 10.1002/art.23318.

引用本文的文献

1
Excellent clinical and radiological outcome following locking compression plate fixation of displaced medial clavicle fractures.锁定加压钢板固定移位的锁骨内侧骨折的良好临床和影像学结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 27;22(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04775-8.
2
Reconstruction or replacement? A challenging question in surgical treatment of complex humeral head fractures in the elderly.重建还是置换?老年复杂肱骨外科颈骨折治疗中的难题
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3247-3254. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04124-3. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

本文引用的文献

1
A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.一种评估肩部功能的标准化方法。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
2
[Schulthess Hip Score (5 items) for assessing disability in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Development and validation].[用于评估全髋关节置换术患者残疾情况的舒尔特斯髋关节评分(5项)。开发与验证]
Orthopade. 2010 Sep;39(9):834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1611-7.
3
Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability.
如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.
4
Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial.锁骨肩峰端钢板内固定取出术是否影响功能结局:一项前瞻性试验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jan;142(1):139-144. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03669-z. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
5
[Importance of self-assessment in functional evaluation of trauma patients].[自我评估在创伤患者功能评估中的重要性]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Dec;121(12):956-961. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0564-x.
6
A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Upper Extremity Trauma.上肢创伤后评估残疾的结局指标的系统评价
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2017 Jul 27;1(4):e021. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00021. eCollection 2017 Jul.
7
Quality of life after antegrade intramedullary nail fixation of humeral fractures: a survey in a selected cohort of Brazilian patients.肱骨骨折顺行髓内钉固定术后的生活质量:对一组巴西患者的调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2018 Mar 12;12:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-018-0150-8. eCollection 2018.
8
Development of a German fracture register to assess current fracture care and improve treatment quality: A feasibility study.开发德国骨折登记系统以评估当前骨折护理情况并提高治疗质量:一项可行性研究。
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Dec 4;2(12):474-477. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160086. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Return to sports after plate fixation of humeral head fractures 65 cases with minimum 24-month follow-up.肱骨近端骨折钢板固定术后重返运动:65例患者至少随访24个月
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1532-2.
10
Additional calcar support using a blade device reduces secondary varus displacement following reconstruction of the proximal humerus: a prospective study.使用刀片装置提供额外的肱骨距支持可减少肱骨近端重建后的继发性内翻移位:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2015 Oct 7;20:82. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0178-5.
用于评估肩部残疾的主观结局指标的批判性评价
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):9-13. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836440522.
4
Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires.测量肩部功能:四项问卷的系统评价
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32. doi: 10.1002/art.24396.
5
Outcome analysis of surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff: a comparison of subjective and objective scoring tools.肩袖疾病手术的结果分析:主观与客观评分工具的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):367-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.20714.
6
Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty.六种结局评估工具在全肩关节置换术中的反应性
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):391-8. doi: 10.1002/art.23318.
7
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
8
[Development of a questionnaire for patient self-assessment of shoulder function based on the Rowe score].[基于罗伊评分法开发患者肩部功能自我评估问卷]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Feb;110(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1198-y.
9
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.美国肩肘外科医生主观肩关节评分量表在肩关节不稳定、肩袖疾病和盂肱关节炎患者中的信度、效度及反应度
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2006-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01624.
10
[Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review].[肩部功能障碍问卷:一项系统评价]
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Jul;48(6):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.007. Epub 2005 Apr 26.