Schmidutz Florian, Beirer Marc, Braunstein Volker, Bogner Viktoria, Wiedemann Ernst, Biberthaler Peter
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Patient Saf Surg. 2012 May 18;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-6-9.
Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires.
A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis.
Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively.
We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature.
肩部手术的疗效评估对于评价患者安全性和治疗效率至关重要。目前,由于大多数患者报告的自我评估工具缺乏可比性,这一评估受到了影响。因此,本研究旨在开发一种可靠的自我评估问卷,以便于对患者进行随访。该问卷还可用于计算3种成熟的评分系统,即肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)、Constant-Murley评分(CMS)以及上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)。这三种系统的主观和客观项目被浓缩成一份包含30个问题的单一问卷,并与原始问卷进行了验证。
邀请我院肩部门诊的一组具有代表性的患者填写新设计的慕尼黑肩部自我评估问卷(MSQ)。同时,发放用于CONSTANT、SPADI和DASH评分自我评估的成熟问卷。通过线性回归分析比较所得结果。
51名患者完成了所有问卷。结果的相关系数分别为:SPADI评分系统r = 0.91,DASH评分系统r = -0.93,CMS评分系统r = 0.94。
我们开发了一种可对肩部功能进行定量自我评估的工具。它通过一份简短的30项问卷为三种最常用的肩部功能评分系统提供了兼容的数据集。该工具可供肩部外科医生有效监测其治疗的疗效、安全性和质量,并将结果与文献中已发表的数据进行比较。