Carreras A, Palma A, Mendoza C
Dpto. de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Andrologia. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):313-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1990.tb01992.x.
Semen samples from a total 58 men were examined by routine semen analyses and the hypoosmotic swelling test. Samples were classified as normal, oligo-, astheno- or oligoasthenozoospermic on the basis of spermatogram findings. The latter three groups showed a significant decrease in the percentage of HOS positive forms in comparison to normal spermograms. All these samples were treated with the swim up technique to select motile spermatozoa, using a procedure similar to that routinely employed in clinical settings for homologous intrauterine insemination (IUI). Following swim-up, the ejaculate supernatant and residual precipitate were subjected to the hypoosmotic swelling test (HOS test), and the percentage of normal forms was determined in the three groups. The results showed greater percentages of HOS positive, normal and HOS positive-normal forms in the group of normal individuals than in any of the other three groups. The supernatant used in IUI showed a significant increase in percentage HOS positive spermatozoa, normal forms and spermatozoa which were both normal and HOS positive in comparison with the other two groups in normal and oligozoospermic samples, but not in samples which presented suboptimal motility (astheno- and oligozoospermia). In conclusion, the swim-up technique is effective in separating high-quality spermatozoa in normo- and oligozoospermic samples, although its effectiveness with astheno- and oligoasthenozoospermic samples should be questioned.
对总共58名男性的精液样本进行了常规精液分析和低渗肿胀试验。根据精子图结果,样本被分类为正常、少精子症、弱精子症或少弱精子症。与正常精子图相比,后三组的低渗肿胀试验(HOS)阳性形态百分比显著降低。所有这些样本均采用上游法处理以选择活动精子,其程序类似于临床环境中常规用于同源宫内人工授精(IUI)的程序。上游处理后,对射精上清液和残留沉淀物进行低渗肿胀试验(HOS试验),并测定三组中正常形态的百分比。结果显示,正常个体组中HOS阳性、正常和HOS阳性-正常形态的百分比高于其他三组中的任何一组。与正常和少精子症样本中的其他两组相比,IUI中使用的上清液中HOS阳性精子、正常形态精子以及正常且HOS阳性精子的百分比显著增加,但在活力欠佳的样本(弱精子症和少弱精子症)中则不然。总之,上游法在分离正常和少精子症样本中的高质量精子方面是有效的,尽管其在弱精子症和少弱精子症样本中的有效性值得质疑。