Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Aug;102(8):1535-41. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300765. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
We examined socioeconomic inequalities in health among older adults in England and Brazil.
We analyzed nationally representative samples of residents aged 50 years and older in 2008 data from the Brazilian National Household Survey (n = 75,527) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 9589). We estimated prevalence ratios for self-rated health, functional limitations, and reported chronic diseases, by education level and household income tertiles.
Brazilians reported worse health than did English respondents. Country-specific differences were higher among the poorest, but also affected the wealthiest persons. We observed a strong inverse gradient of similar magnitude across education and household income levels for most health indicators in each country. Prevalence ratios (lowest vs highest education level) of poor self-rated health were 3.24 in Brazil and 3.50 in England; having 2 or more functional limitations, 1.81 in Brazil and 1.96 in England; and having 1 or more diseases, 1.14 in Brazil and 1.36 in England.
Socioeconomic inequalities in health affect both populations, despite a less pronounced absolute difference in household income and education in Brazil than in England.
我们考察了英国和巴西老年人的健康状况中的社会经济不平等。
我们分析了 2008 年巴西全国家庭调查(n=75527)和英国老龄化纵向研究(n=9589)中年龄在 50 岁及以上的居民的全国代表性样本。我们根据教育水平和家庭收入三分位数,估计了自评健康、功能限制和报告的慢性病的流行比率。
与英国受访者相比,巴西人报告的健康状况更差。在最贫困的人群中,国家间的差异更大,但也影响了最富有的人。我们观察到,在每个国家,大多数健康指标在教育和家庭收入水平上都存在着相似程度的强烈负梯度。自评健康状况不佳的流行比率(最低与最高教育水平相比)在巴西为 3.24,在英国为 3.50;有 2 种或更多功能限制的流行比率在巴西为 1.81,在英国为 1.96;有 1 种或更多疾病的流行比率在巴西为 1.14,在英国为 1.36。
尽管巴西的家庭收入和教育水平的绝对差异比英国小,但健康状况中的社会经济不平等影响了这两个国家的人口。