Center for Human Immunology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 28092, USA.
Cytokine. 2012 Nov;60(2):438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.05.019. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
Cytokines are humoral regulatory molecules that act together in immunologic pathways. Monitoring cytokines and their variations within physiologic ranges is critical for biomarker discovery. Therefore, we evaluated the performance characteristics of 72 analytes measured by multiplex cytokine immunoassay, with an emphasis on the differences of analytes measured in serum compared to plasma, and, in plasma, on the impact of anticoagulants on the cytokine measurement.
We used fluorescent bead-based (Luminex) immunoassay kits to simultaneously measure 72 analytes. We tested serum and plasma samples from 11 matched donors. Plasma samples were anti-coagulated with sodium heparin, sodium citrate dextrose and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), respectively.
Of the 72 cytokines, 12 were undetectable in all types of specimen samples. Nineteen analytes, including PDGF-bb, IL-4, IL-8, IL-9, FGF-b, PAI-1, CXCL-5, CCL-5, CD40L, EGF, VEGF, IL-2ra, IL-3, SDF-1a, PCT, MCP-3, GIP, IL-16 and fibrinogen, showed significant differences between measurements in serum and all types of plasma, regardless of anticoagulant. Among plasma samples, 10 analytes (eotaxin, SCGF-b, MCP-1, SCF, MIP-1b, VEGF, RANTES, PDGF-b, PAI-1 and ITAC) showed significantly higher concentrations in heparinized plasma compared to citrated and EDTA plasma. IP-10, and CTAK were the only 2 cytokines that presented different concentrations in citrate and EDTA plasma.
With their small volume, low cost per test, and multiplex capacity, Luminex-based cytokine assays have enormous potential utility for screening in epidemiologic studies. In our study, we showed that many cytokines' concentrations differed between serum and plasma samples, and that different anticoagulants used in preparation of plasma samples also affected the measurement of some cytokines. There was no optimal sample preparation that was clearly superior for the measurement of all analytes measured. Ultimately, the utility of cytokine measurement, as biomarker or to monitor the immune system, will depend on attention to detail in the collection and processing of samples in addition to assay precision.
细胞因子是体液调节分子,它们在免疫途径中共同作用。监测细胞因子及其在生理范围内的变化对于生物标志物的发现至关重要。因此,我们评估了通过多重细胞因子免疫分析测量的 72 种分析物的性能特征,重点是比较血清和血浆中分析物的差异,以及在血浆中,抗凝剂对细胞因子测量的影响。
我们使用基于荧光珠的(Luminex)免疫分析试剂盒同时测量 72 种分析物。我们测试了 11 个匹配供体的血清和血浆样本。血浆样本分别用肝素钠、柠檬酸钠葡萄糖和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)抗凝。
在 72 种细胞因子中,有 12 种在所有类型的标本样本中均无法检测到。有 19 种分析物,包括 PDGF-bb、IL-4、IL-8、IL-9、FGF-b、PAI-1、CXCL-5、CCL-5、CD40L、EGF、VEGF、IL-2ra、IL-3、SDF-1a、PCT、MCP-3、GIP、IL-16 和纤维蛋白原,在血清和所有类型的血浆测量中均显示出显著差异,与抗凝剂无关。在血浆样本中,10 种分析物(eotaxin、SCGF-b、MCP-1、SCF、MIP-1b、VEGF、RANTES、PDGF-b、PAI-1 和 ITAC)在肝素化血浆中的浓度明显高于柠檬酸盐和 EDTA 血浆。IP-10 和 CTAK 是仅有的 2 种在柠檬酸盐和 EDTA 血浆中浓度不同的细胞因子。
基于 Luminex 的细胞因子分析具有体积小、每次检测成本低、多重容量大的特点,对于流行病学研究中的筛选具有巨大的潜在应用价值。在我们的研究中,我们表明,许多细胞因子的浓度在血清和血浆样本之间存在差异,并且用于制备血浆样本的不同抗凝剂也会影响某些细胞因子的测量。没有一种明显优于所有分析物测量的最佳样本制备方法。最终,细胞因子测量作为生物标志物或监测免疫系统的用途,将取决于除了分析精度之外,还取决于对样本收集和处理细节的关注。