London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E64-77.
Over the past three decades, international covenants have been signed and countries have implemented strategies and legislation to address violence against women. Concurrently, strong evidence on the magnitude and impact of violence against women has emerged from around the world. Despite a growing understanding of factors that may influence women's vulnerability to violence and its effects, key questions about intervention options persist. Using evidence from a WHO household survey on domestic violence, our paper discusses women's help-seeking patterns and considers these findings in relation to Brazil's policies and strategies on violence against women. For the WHO survey, data from a large urban center (the city of São Paulo) and from a rural region (Zona da Mata Pernambucana [ZMP]) was collected. Findings from this survey indicate that in São Paulo, only 33.8% of women who experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) sought help from a formal service provider, including health, legal, social, or women's support services; in the Forest Zone of the State of Pernambuco, an even smaller proportion (17.1%) sought formal assistance. The majority of women were likely to contact only informal sources of support, such as family, friends, and neighbors. Women who used formal services were primarily those who experienced more severe levels of violence, were severely injured, had children who witnessed the violence, or whose work was disrupted by the violence. Although Brazil adopted progressive laws and national and local strategies to address violence against women (VAW), messages about violence and equality need to reach informal networks and the wider community in order to national anti-violence policies to be successful in supporting women before violence becomes intolerable.. To translate international standards and national policies into actions that genuinely reach women experiencing violence, states must carefully consider evidence on women's options and decision making.
在过去的三十年中,国际公约已经签署,各国也实施了战略和立法来解决针对妇女的暴力问题。与此同时,世界各地也出现了大量关于暴力侵害妇女行为的规模和影响的有力证据。尽管人们越来越了解可能影响妇女易受暴力侵害及其影响的因素,但关于干预选择的关键问题仍然存在。本文利用世界卫生组织关于家庭暴力的一项住户调查的证据,讨论了妇女寻求帮助的模式,并结合巴西针对暴力侵害妇女行为的政策和战略对这些发现进行了审议。在世界卫生组织的调查中,从一个大城市(圣保罗市)和一个农村地区(伯南布哥州的森林区)收集了数据。这项调查的结果表明,在圣保罗,只有 33.8%遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女向包括卫生、法律、社会或妇女支持服务在内的正式服务提供者寻求帮助;在伯南布哥州的森林区,寻求正式援助的妇女比例甚至更小(17.1%)。大多数妇女可能只联系非正式的支持来源,如家人、朋友和邻居。利用正式服务的妇女主要是那些遭受更严重暴力程度、受重伤、目睹暴力的子女或其工作因暴力而受到干扰的妇女。尽管巴西通过了处理暴力侵害妇女行为的进步法律以及国家和地方战略,但关于暴力和平等的信息需要传达给非正式网络和更广泛的社区,以便国家反暴力政策能够在暴力变得无法容忍之前成功地支持妇女。为了将国际标准和国家政策转化为真正惠及遭受暴力侵害的妇女的行动,各国必须仔细考虑妇女的选择和决策的证据。