• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.测验增强学习:区分测验的直接和间接效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):940-5. doi: 10.1037/a0029199. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.测试增强学习:三项独立重复研究、一个被否定的假设以及一个意外的边界条件。
Memory. 2018 Apr;26(4):406-414. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1350717. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.为什么测试-再学习练习对记忆有益?对中介转移假设的评估。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):737-46. doi: 10.1037/a0026166. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
4
Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.间隔检索:绝对间隔增强学习,而与相对间隔无关。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1250-7. doi: 10.1037/a0023436.
5
Free recall enhances subsequent learning.自由回忆增强了后续学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):507-13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3.
6
Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.检索练习可改善多发性硬化症患者的记忆:测试效应的临床应用。
Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):267-72. doi: 10.1037/a0017533.
7
Filling in the gaps: using testing and restudy to promote associative learning.填补空白:利用测试和重新学习来促进联想学习。
Memory. 2016 Oct;24(9):1267-77. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1098706. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
The testing effect under divided attention.分散注意力情况下的测试效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1934-1947. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000427. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.提取诱发遗忘:再探竞争性干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1433-48. doi: 10.1037/a0032975. Epub 2013 May 20.
10
Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.测试和反馈对后期检索前端控制的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):437-50. doi: 10.1037/a0028886. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation.多项选择题测验可以提高对错误信息的记忆,但不会降低对错误信息的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jun 6;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00488-9.
2
Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding.绩效反馈可增强测试增强型编码。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr 20;17:1100497. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1100497. eCollection 2023.
3
Different Perspectives on Retest Effects in the Context of Spatial Thinking: Interplay of Behavioral Performance, Cognitive Processing, and Cognitive Workload.空间思维背景下重测效应的不同视角:行为表现、认知加工与认知负荷的相互作用
J Intell. 2023 Mar 29;11(4):66. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040066.
4
Prior Knowledge Norms for Naming Country Outlines: An Open Stimulus Set.命名国家轮廓的先验知识规范:一个开放的刺激集。
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 30;6(1):14. doi: 10.5334/joc.260. eCollection 2023.
5
Retrieval Practice Enhances New Learning but does Not Affect Performance in Subsequent Arithmetic Tasks.检索练习可增强新的学习效果,但不影响后续算术任务的表现。
J Cogn. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.216. eCollection 2022.
6
Teaching Basic Calculations in an Introductory Biology Lab.在基础生物学实验室中教授基本计算
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Mar 14;23(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00199-21. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
You won't guess that: On the limited benefits of guessing when learning a foreign language.你可能想不到:学习外语时猜测的有限好处。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1033-1047. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01254-2. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
8
We Know More Than We Ever Learned: Processes Involved in the Accumulation of World Knowledge.我们所知多于所学:世界知识积累所涉及的过程。
Child Dev Perspect. 2021 Dec;15(4):220-227. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12430. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?学习者为什么会忽略在进行检索练习的元认知决策时所预期的反馈?
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1423-1435. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01171-4. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.元认知控制对有反馈和无反馈的检索练习分配以及学习者间隔选择的效果。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01100-x. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.何时以及为何失败的测试会增强后续研究的效果。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):290-6. doi: 10.1037/a0028468. Epub 2012 May 14.
2
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?何时以及为何检索尝试会增强随后的编码?
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):505-13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0.
3
Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.犯相关错误有助于学习,但学习者并不知道这一点。
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):514-27. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z.
4
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.检索练习在长期保持中的关键作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
5
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.元认知控制与策略选择:在学习中决定进行检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86. doi: 10.1037/a0017341.
6
Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.检索尝试失败会增强后续学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):989-98. doi: 10.1037/a0015729.
7
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.言语回忆任务中的分散练习:一项综述与定量综合分析。
Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):354-80. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354.
8
Function of test trials in paired-associate learning.配对联想学习中测试试验的功能。
J Exp Psychol. 1967 Oct;75(2):194-209. doi: 10.1037/h0024971.

测验增强学习:区分测验的直接和间接效应。

Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University inSt. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):940-5. doi: 10.1037/a0029199. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1037/a0029199
PMID:22774852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3764602/
Abstract

The facilitative effect of retrieval practice, or testing, on the probability of later retrieval has been the focus of much recent empirical research. A lesser known benefit of retrieval practice is that it may also enhance the ability of a learner to benefit from a subsequent restudy opportunity. This facilitative effect of retrieval practice on subsequent encoding is known as test-potentiated learning. Thus far, however, the literature has not isolated the indirect effect of retrieval practice on subsequent memory (via enhancing the effectiveness of restudy) from the direct effects of retrieval on subsequent memory. The experiment presented here uses conditional probability to disentangle test-potentiated learning from the direct effects of retrieval practice. The results indicate that unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance the effectiveness of subsequent restudy, demonstrating that tests do potentiate subsequent learning.

摘要

检索练习(或测试)对后续检索的可能性的促进作用一直是最近实证研究的重点。检索练习的一个不太为人知的好处是,它还可以提高学习者从后续的复习机会中获益的能力。这种检索练习对后续编码的促进作用被称为测试增强学习。然而,到目前为止,文献尚未将检索练习对后续记忆的间接影响(通过增强复习的有效性)与检索对后续记忆的直接影响区分开来。本实验使用条件概率将测试增强学习与检索练习的直接效果分离开来。结果表明,不成功的检索尝试会增强后续复习的有效性,这表明测试确实可以增强后续学习。