School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Mar;22(5-6):817-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04053.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
To determine the effect of written plus oral information vs. oral information alone on precolonoscopy anxiety.
Information provision has been considered to reduce precolonoscopy anxiety. However, the best means to provide information before colonoscopy has not yet been determined as there is inconsistency in the outcomes of the clinical trials.
A two-group, pretest, post-test, prospective, quasi-experimental design with non-random assignment.
Participants were assigned to group 1 or 2 in the study. In the enrolment all the participants completed the questionnaires to collect personal characteristics data and assessed subjects' anxiety level by the Chinese version of the State Scale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory as baseline data. After that, subjects in group 1 received written plus oral information before colonoscopy, while those in group 2 received oral information before colonoscopy. On the day for colonoscopy all subjects completed the Chinese version of the State Scale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory again.
There was no difference in state anxiety and personal characteristic between the two groups at enrolment. After the intervention, although the state anxiety scores were dropped, there were no statistical significant differences between two groups or within groups 1 and 2.
Information provision before colonoscopy did not reduce the anxiety level in patients directly before colonoscopy.
There was a trend that information had a positive effect on patients' state anxiety. Future information provision studies may need to add more interactive methods appropriately and take patients' gender, educational level and coping style into consideration.
确定书面加口头信息与仅口头信息对结肠镜检查前焦虑的影响。
提供信息被认为可以降低结肠镜检查前的焦虑。然而,由于临床试验的结果不一致,结肠镜检查前提供信息的最佳方法尚未确定。
采用两组、预测试、后测试、前瞻性、准实验设计,非随机分组。
研究参与者被分配到组 1 或组 2。在入组时,所有参与者都填写了问卷,以收集个人特征数据,并使用状态特质焦虑量表的中文版评估受试者的焦虑水平作为基线数据。之后,组 1 患者在结肠镜检查前接受书面加口头信息,而组 2 患者仅接受口头信息。所有受试者在结肠镜检查当天再次完成状态特质焦虑量表的中文版。
入组时两组在状态焦虑和个人特征方面无差异。干预后,虽然状态焦虑评分有所下降,但两组之间或组 1 和组 2 内部均无统计学差异。
结肠镜检查前提供信息并不能直接降低患者的焦虑水平。
信息对患者的状态焦虑有积极影响的趋势。未来的信息提供研究可能需要适当增加更多的互动方法,并考虑患者的性别、教育水平和应对方式。