University of Exeter Medical School, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):973-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441221. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Researchers who study perspective taking are generally optimistic about the potential for interventions to improve intergroup perceptions. The current research provides new insight into the conditions that frame the intergroup outcomes of perspective taking. The results show that the effects of perspective taking are not always positive but depend on perspective takers' degree of identification with the in-group. In two experiments, we demonstrated that adopting the perspective of an out-group member can have damaging effects on intergroup perceptions among group members who are highly identified with the in-group. Specifically, compared with less committed members, those who identified highly with the in-group used a greater number of negative traits to describe the out-group following perspective taking. Such perspective taking also led participants with high in-group identification to judge the out-group less favorably. Understanding how social identity concerns frame the outcome of perspective taking is crucial to its effective employment in intergroup-relations programs.
研究换位思考的研究人员通常对干预措施改善群体间看法的潜力持乐观态度。当前的研究为换位思考对群体间结果的影响提供了新的视角。结果表明,换位思考的效果并不总是积极的,而是取决于换位思考者对群体的认同程度。在两项实验中,我们证明了,对于高度认同群体的群体成员来说,从群体外成员的角度看问题会对群体间的看法产生破坏性影响。具体来说,与认同度较低的成员相比,那些高度认同群体的成员在进行换位思考后,会用更多的负面特征来描述群体外的成员。这种换位思考还导致那些高度认同内群体的参与者对群体外成员的评价不那么有利。了解社会认同关注如何影响换位思考的结果,对于在群体关系项目中有效地运用换位思考至关重要。