Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Psychol Health. 2013;28(1):84-102. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.714782. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
The Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R) is commonly used to measure illness perceptions. We tested whether the structure of the IPQ-R was appropriate for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients.
Confirmatory (C) and exploratory (E) factor analyses (FA) were used to test whether the structure of the IPQ-R was supported for patients with knee pain (n = 393), hand pain (n = 2113) and back pain (n = 1591). CFA was used to test whether the timeline acute/chronic, timeline cyclical, consequences, personal control, treatment control, illness coherence and emotional representation dimensions of the IPQ-R were distinct; EFA was used to explore potential structure for patients' views on the cause of their condition.
Goodness-of-fit indices for the CFA were below our criteria for good model fit. Removal of six items from the model improved model fit, but our criteria for good model fit was still not achieved. An interpretable factor solution could not be determined for the causal items on the questionnaire.
Our data show limited evidence that the seven dimensions of the IPQ-R are distinct. A clear structure for the causal items was not determined. Further work is needed to develop the IPQ-R for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients.
修订后的疾病感知问卷(IPQ-R)常用于测量疾病感知。我们测试了该问卷的结构是否适用于初级保健肌肉骨骼疼痛患者。
采用验证性(C)和探索性(E)因子分析(FA)来检验膝关节疼痛(n=393)、手部疼痛(n=2113)和腰痛(n=1591)患者的 IPQ-R 结构是否合理。CFA 用于检验 IPQ-R 的时间线急性/慢性、时间线周期性、后果、个人控制、治疗控制、疾病连贯性和情绪表达维度是否不同;EFA 用于探索患者对病情病因的看法的潜在结构。
验证性因子分析的拟合优度指数低于我们设定的良好模型拟合标准。从模型中删除 6 个项目后,模型拟合得到改善,但仍未达到我们设定的良好模型拟合标准。问卷中因果关系项目的可解释因子解决方案无法确定。
我们的数据表明,IPQ-R 的七个维度的区分度有限。因果关系项目的结构不明确。需要进一步研究开发适用于初级保健肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的 IPQ-R。