• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最后通牒博弈中的偷窃行为:黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩对不公平不敏感。

Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.

机构信息

Department for Developmental and Biological Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):942-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0519. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0519
PMID:22896269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3497113/
Abstract

Humans, but not chimpanzees, punish unfair offers in ultimatum games, suggesting that fairness concerns evolved sometime after the split between the lineages that gave rise to Homo and Pan. However, nothing is known about fairness concerns in the other Pan species, bonobos. Furthermore, apes do not typically offer food to others, but they do react against theft. We presented a novel game, the ultimatum theft game, to both of our closest living relatives. Bonobos and chimpanzee 'proposers' consistently stole food from the responders' portions, but the responders did not reject any non-zero offer. These results support the interpretation that the human sense of fairness is a derived trait.

摘要

人类而非黑猩猩会在最后通牒博弈中惩罚不公平的提议,这表明公平关切是在导致人类和黑猩猩的谱系分裂之后的某个时间进化而来的。然而,对于其他的黑猩猩物种——倭黑猩猩,人们对其公平关切一无所知。此外,猿类通常不会主动给他人提供食物,但它们会对盗窃行为做出反应。我们向我们两个最近的亲属展示了一种新的游戏,即最后通牒盗窃游戏。倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩的“提议者”总是从“回应者”的份额中偷走食物,但“回应者”没有拒绝任何非零的提议。这些结果支持这样的解释,即人类的公平感是一种衍生特征。

相似文献

1
Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.最后通牒博弈中的偷窃行为:黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩对不公平不敏感。
Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):942-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0519. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在最后通牒博弈中使用社会影响力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 10;288(1962):20211937. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1937. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game.黑猩猩在最后通牒博弈中是理性的利益最大化者。
Science. 2007 Oct 5;318(5847):107-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1145850.
4
A Comparison Between Bonobos and Chimpanzees: A Review and Update.倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩的比较:综述与更新
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Sep;25(5):239-252. doi: 10.1002/evan.21501.
5
Bargaining in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effect of cost, amount of gift, reciprocity, and communication.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的讨价还价行为:成本、礼物数量、互惠性及交流的影响
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):542-550. doi: 10.1037/com0000189. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.黑猩猩玩最后通牒游戏。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2070-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220806110. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
7
The expression of empathy in human's closest relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees: current and future directions.在人类最亲近的亲属——倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩中表达同理心:当前和未来的方向。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Aug;99(4):1556-1575. doi: 10.1111/brv.13080. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
8
Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)相互注视眼球的差异。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 Aug;134(3):318-322. doi: 10.1037/com0000247.
9
Spontaneous triadic engagement in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的自发三元互动。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Aug;127(3):245-255. doi: 10.1037/a0030935. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的社会玩耍:对自然社会系统和个体间关系的启示
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Mar;129(3):418-26. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20289.

引用本文的文献

1
Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.倭黑猩猩对不平等的奖励分配会产生厌恶反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2045):20242873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2873. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Fairness in the multi-proposer-multi-responder ultimatum game.多提议者-多回应者最后通牒博弈中的公平性
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 4;20(3):e0319178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319178. eCollection 2025.
3
Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game.黑猩猩在三方最后通牒博弈中表现出竞争利他行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53973-6.
4
Competitive and cooperative games for probing the neural basis of social decision-making in animals.用于探测动物社会决策神经基础的竞争与合作游戏。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Jun;149:105158. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105158. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Comparative economics: how studying other primates helps us better understand the evolution of our own economic decision making.比较经济学:研究其他灵长类动物如何帮助我们更好地理解人类自身经济决策的演变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210497. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0497. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
6
Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在最后通牒博弈中使用社会影响力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 10;288(1962):20211937. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1937. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Looking Like a Million Dollars: Does Attractiveness Priming Increase Altruistic Behavior in Experimental Games?看起来身价百万:吸引力启动效应会增加实验游戏中的利他行为吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:658466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658466. eCollection 2021.
8
Evolution of egalitarian social norm by resource management.资源管理导致平等主义社会规范的演变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0227902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227902. eCollection 2020.
9
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tolerate some degree of inequity while cooperating but refuse to donate effort for nothing.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在合作时可以容忍一定程度的不公平,但不会白白付出努力。
Am J Primatol. 2020 Jan;82(1):e23084. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23084. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
Social and Non-social Mechanisms of Inequity Aversion in Non-human Animals.非人类动物中不平等厌恶的社会和非社会机制
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun 21;13:133. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00133. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members.黑猩猩不会利用成本极低的机会为非亲属群体成员提供食物。
Anim Behav. 2008 May 1;75(5):1757-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.036.
2
Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness.心理理论增强了对公平的偏好。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
3
Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm.猿类厌恶不公平吗?代币交换范式的新数据。
Am J Primatol. 2009 Feb;71(2):175-81. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20639.
4
Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game.黑猩猩在最后通牒博弈中是理性的利益最大化者。
Science. 2007 Oct 5;318(5847):107-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1145850.
5
Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful.黑猩猩会报复,但并非恶意刁难。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13046-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705555104. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
6
Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task.宽容使倭黑猩猩在合作任务中表现优于黑猩猩。
Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.040. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
7
Are apes really inequity averse?猿类真的厌恶不公平吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 22;273(1605):3123-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3693.
8
What's in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees.这对我有什么好处?自我关注排除了黑猩猩的利他主义和恶意。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 22;273(1589):1013-21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3417.
9
"Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.跨文化视角下的“经济人”:15个小规模社会中的行为实验
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Dec;28(6):795-815; discussion 815-55. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000142.
10
Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members.黑猩猩对群体中无血缘关系成员的福祉漠不关心。
Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1357-9. doi: 10.1038/nature04243.