评估大都市查尔斯顿有毒物质释放清单设施的分布情况：一项环境正义案例研究。
Assessment of the distribution of toxic release inventory facilities in metropolitan Charleston: an environmental justice case study.
机构信息
Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1974-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300700. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
We assessed spatial disparities in the distribution of Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities in Charleston, SC.
METHODS
We used spatial methods and regression to assess burden disparities in the study area at the block and census-tract levels by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES).
RESULTS
Results revealed an inverse relationship between distance to TRI facilities and race/ethnicity and SES at the block and census-tract levels. Results of regression analyses showed a positive association between presence of TRI facilities and high percentage non-White and a negative association between number of TRI facilities and high SES.
CONCLUSIONS
There are burden disparities in the distribution of TRI facilities in Charleston at the block and census-tract level by race/ethnicity and SES. Additional research is needed to understand cumulative risk in the region.
摘要
目的
我们评估了南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿市有毒物质释放清单（TRI）设施分布的空间差异。
方法
我们使用空间方法和回归分析，按种族/民族和社会经济地位（SES）评估研究区域内街区和普查区层面的负担差异。
结果
结果表明，距离 TRI 设施的距离与街区和普查区层面的种族/民族和 SES 呈反比关系。回归分析结果表明，TRI 设施的存在与高比例的非白人呈正相关，而与高 SES 呈负相关。
结论
查尔斯顿的 TRI 设施分布在街区和普查区层面存在负担差异，按种族/民族和 SES 划分。需要进一步研究以了解该地区的累积风险。
相似文献
1
Assessment of the distribution of toxic release inventory facilities in metropolitan Charleston: an environmental justice case study.评估大都市查尔斯顿有毒物质释放清单设施的分布情况：一项环境正义案例研究。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1974-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300700. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
2
Spatial disparity in the distribution of superfund sites in South Carolina: an ecological study.南卡罗来纳州超级基金场地分布的空间差异：一项生态学研究。
Environ Health. 2013 Nov 6;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-96.
3
A spatial evaluation of socio demographics surrounding National Priorities List sites in Florida using a distance-based approach.利用基于距离的方法对佛罗里达州国家优先名单地点周围的社会人口统计学进行空间评估。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Jun 17;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-33.
4
Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta.大亚特兰大地区有毒物质排放清单选址与排放中的社会人口统计学差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 23;13(8):747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080747.
5
Being overburdened and medically underserved: assessment of this double disparity for populations in the state of Maryland.负担过重且医疗服务不足：对马里兰州人口的这一双重差距的评估。
Environ Health. 2014 Apr 4;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-26.
6
Disparities in COPD Hospitalizations: A Spatial Analysis of Proximity to Toxics Release Inventory Facilities in Illinois.COPD 住院差异：伊利诺伊州毒物释放清单设施邻近度的空间分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;18(24):13128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413128.
7
GIS modeling of air toxics releases from TRI-reporting and non-TRI-reporting facilities: impacts for environmental justice.有毒空气污染物排放的地理信息系统建模：来自有毒物质排放清单报告设施和非有毒物质排放清单报告设施的排放情况及其对环境正义的影响
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1717-24. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7066.
8
Race, socioeconomic status, and air pollution exposure in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州的种族、社会经济地位和空气污染暴露。
Environ Res. 2013 Oct;126:152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, Residential Segregation, and Spatial Variation in Noise Exposure in the Contiguous United States.美国本土的种族/族裔、社会经济地位、居住隔离与噪声暴露的空间差异
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 25;125(7):077017. doi: 10.1289/EHP898.
10
Use of segregation indices, Townsend Index, and air toxics data to assess lifetime cancer risk disparities in metropolitan Charleston, South Carolina, USA.利用隔离指数、汤森指数和空气毒物数据评估美国南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿都会区的终生癌症风险差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 21;11(5):5510-26. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505510.
引用本文的文献
1
Disparities in demographic and health indicators among communities by frequency of hazardous waste sites in Indiana, USA: differences by Superfund vs. brownfield classification.美国印第安纳州社区中危险废物场地频率与人口和健康指标的差异：超级基金场地与棕地分类的差异
Environ Justice. 2025 Feb;18(1):47-56. doi: 10.1089/env.2023.0070. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Validating self-reported Toxic Release Inventory data using Benford's Law: investigating toxic chemical release hazards in floodplains.利用本福德定律验证自我报告的有毒物质释放清单数据：调查洪泛区有毒化学物质释放的危害。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;12:1342510. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1342510. eCollection 2024.
3
Sociodemographic inequities in the burden of carcinogenic industrial air emissions in the United States.美国致癌工业空气排放负担的社会人口统计学不平等。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 May 8;116(5):737-744. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae001.
4
It's electric! An environmental equity perspective on the lifecycle of our energy sources.这是电力驱动的！从环境公平视角看我们能源的生命周期。
Environ Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 3;7(2):e246. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000246. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Road traffic density and recurrent asthma emergency department visits among Medicaid enrollees in New York State 2005-2015.道路交通密度与 2005-2015 年纽约州医疗补助参保者哮喘急诊就诊的相关性研究
Environ Health. 2022 Jul 28;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00885-5.
6
Climate Justice and California's Methane Superemitters: Environmental Equity Assessment of Community Proximity and Exposure Intensity.气候正义与加州的甲烷超级排放源：社区接近度和暴露强度的环境公平评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Nov 2;55(21):14746-14757. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04328. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Hybrid Resiliency-Stressor Conceptual Framework for Informing Decision Support Tools and Addressing Environmental Injustice and Health Inequities.用于为决策支持工具提供信息并解决环境不公平和健康不平等问题的混合弹性-压力概念框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):1466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081466.
8
The utility of a system dynamics approach for understanding cumulative health risk from exposure to environmental hazards.系统动力学方法在理解环境危害暴露导致累积健康风险中的应用。
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.039. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta.大亚特兰大地区有毒物质排放清单选址与排放中的社会人口统计学差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 23;13(8):747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080747.
10
Native Americans: Where in Environmental Justice Research?美国原住民：在环境正义研究中的地位？
Soc Nat Resour. 2016;29(1):36-52. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1045644. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
本文引用的文献
1
The West End Revitalization Association's community-owned and -managed research model: development, implementation, and action.西区振兴协会的社区所有及管理的研究模式：发展、实施与行动。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Winter;1(4):339-49. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0037.
2
Use of EPA collaborative problem-solving model to obtain environmental justice in North Carolina.运用美国环境保护局协作式解决问题模型在北卡罗来纳州实现环境正义。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Winter;1(4):327-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0036.
3
Inequalities, inequities, environmental justice in waste management and health.废弃物管理与健康领域的不平等、不公平和环境正义。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):21-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp216. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
4
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in residential proximity to polluting industrial facilities: evidence from the Americans' Changing Lives Study.居住在靠近污染性工业设施附近的种族和社会经济差异：来自“美国人生活变迁研究”的证据。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S649-56. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131383.
5
Superfund, hedonics, and the scales of environmental justice.超级基金法案、快乐学以及环境正义的衡量标准。
Environ Manage. 2009 Nov;44(5):909-20. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9372-y. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
6
Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research.重新评估环境正义研究中的种族和社会经济差异。
Demography. 2006 May;43(2):383-99. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0017.
7
National environmental health measures for minority and low-income populations: tracking social disparities in environmental health.针对少数民族和低收入人群的国家环境卫生措施：追踪环境卫生方面的社会差异。
Environ Res. 2006 Oct;102(2):154-71. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
8
Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas.隔离且不平等：美国大都市区的居住隔离与环境空气有毒物质相关的估计癌症风险
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Mar;114(3):386-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8500.
9
Asthma and air pollution in the Bronx: methodological and data considerations in using GIS for environmental justice and health research.布朗克斯区的哮喘与空气污染：在环境正义和健康研究中使用地理信息系统的方法及数据考量
Health Place. 2007 Mar;13(1):32-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
10
Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland.马里兰州空气中有毒物质导致癌症风险的社会经济和种族差异。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jun;113(6):693-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7609.
Zotero 插件