Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 1008 RCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;7(5):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s11739-012-0848-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Existing data suggest that antipyretic medications may have deleterious effects on immune function and may increase mortality in human infection. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of antipyretic therapy on 28-day in-hospital mortality when administered early in the course of gram-negative severe sepsis or septic shock. This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study at a 1,111-bed academic medical center of all febrile patients with gram-negative bacteremia hospitalized with severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 278) between Jan 2002 and Feb 2008. Although the raw mortality was lower in the group that received an early antipyretic medication (22 vs. 35 %, p = 0.01), patients in the early antipyretic group had higher mean arterial pressure (58.0 vs. 52.7, p = 0.01) and higher 24-h T (max) (39.3 vs. 39.0, p < 0.01). Early antipyretic therapy was not significantly associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.55, 0.29-1.03) in a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for APACHE-II score, hypotension, pneumonia, surgery during hospitalization, persistent fever, and in-hospital dialysis. In conclusion, early antipyretic therapy is not associated with increased mortality.
现有数据表明,退热药物可能对免疫功能产生有害影响,并可能增加人类感染的死亡率。本研究旨在评估在革兰氏阴性严重脓毒症或感染性休克早期给予退热治疗对 28 天院内死亡率的影响。这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2002 年 1 月至 2008 年 2 月期间在一家拥有 1111 张床位的学术医疗中心住院的所有革兰氏阴性菌血症并发严重脓毒症或感染性休克的发热患者(n=278)。尽管接受早期退热药物治疗的患者死亡率较低(22% vs. 35%,p=0.01),但早期退热组的平均动脉压更高(58.0 vs. 52.7,p=0.01),24 小时 T(max)更高(39.3 vs. 39.0,p<0.01)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,控制 APACHE-II 评分、低血压、肺炎、住院期间手术、持续性发热和院内透析后,早期退热治疗与 28 天院内死亡率无显著相关性(调整 OR 0.55,0.29-1.03)。综上所述,早期退热治疗与死亡率增加无关。