• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集体风险困境中策略行为的进化动态。

Evolutionary dynamics of strategic behavior in a collective-risk dilemma.

机构信息

Evolutionary Theory Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(8):e1002652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002652. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002652
PMID:22927807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3426567/
Abstract

A collective-risk social dilemma arises when a group must cooperate to reach a common target in order to avoid the risk of collective loss while each individual is tempted to free-ride on the contributions of others. In contrast to the prisoners' dilemma or public goods games, the collective-risk dilemma encompasses the risk that all individuals lose everything. These characteristics have potential relevance for dangerous climate change and other risky social dilemmas. Cooperation is costly to the individual and it only benefits all individuals if the common target is reached. An individual thus invests without guarantee that the investment is worthwhile for anyone. If there are several subsequent stages of investment, it is not clear when individuals should contribute. For example, they could invest early, thereby signaling their willingness to cooperate in the future, constantly invest their fair share, or wait and compensate missing contributions. To investigate the strategic behavior in such situations, we have simulated the evolutionary dynamics of such collective-risk dilemmas in a finite population. Contributions depend individually on the stage of the game and on the sum of contributions made so far. Every individual takes part in many games and successful behaviors spread in the population. It turns out that constant contributors, such as constant fair sharers, quickly lose out against those who initially do not contribute, but compensate this in later stages of the game. In particular for high risks, such late contributors are favored.

摘要

当一个群体必须合作以达到共同目标,以避免集体损失的风险,而每个个体都受到他人贡献的诱惑时,就会出现集体风险社会困境。与囚徒困境或公共物品博弈不同,集体风险困境包含了所有个体失去一切的风险。这些特征可能与危险的气候变化和其他具有风险的社会困境有关。合作对个体来说是有代价的,只有当共同目标实现时,才对所有个体有利。因此,个体在没有保证投资对任何人都有价值的情况下进行投资。如果有几个后续的投资阶段,就不清楚个体应该在什么时候进行投资。例如,他们可以尽早投资,从而表明他们未来合作的意愿,始终投资他们公平的份额,或者等待并补偿缺失的贡献。为了研究这种情况下的策略行为,我们在有限的群体中模拟了这种集体风险困境的进化动态。贡献取决于个体在游戏阶段的情况以及迄今为止的总贡献。每个个体都参与许多游戏,成功的行为在群体中传播。结果表明,恒定的贡献者,如恒定的公平分担者,很快就会输给那些最初不贡献但在游戏后期会补偿的人。特别是对于高风险,这种晚期贡献者更受欢迎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/22e71b7844d1/pcbi.1002652.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/87945cbeb2e9/pcbi.1002652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/8be0359933e7/pcbi.1002652.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/b482c131c2f3/pcbi.1002652.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/22e71b7844d1/pcbi.1002652.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/87945cbeb2e9/pcbi.1002652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/8be0359933e7/pcbi.1002652.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/b482c131c2f3/pcbi.1002652.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/3426567/22e71b7844d1/pcbi.1002652.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary dynamics of strategic behavior in a collective-risk dilemma.集体风险困境中策略行为的进化动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(8):e1002652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002652. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change.集体风险社会困境与模拟危险气候变化的预防
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2291-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709546105.
3
Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for.群体中的策略性自我调节:当需要合作时,集体实施意图有助于促进合作。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:561388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388. eCollection 2020.
4
Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.具有集体风险的阈值公共品博弈中社会合作的出现
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jul;80(1 Pt 2):016101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016101. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
5
Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks.传递情感和观点可以扭转对集体风险的不作为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17650-17655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922345117. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
7
Solving the collective-risk social dilemma with risky assets in well-mixed and structured populations.在均匀混合和结构化群体中利用风险资产解决集体风险社会困境。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Nov;90(5-1):052823. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052823. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
Under high stakes and uncertainty the rich should lend the poor a helping hand.在高风险和不确定性的情况下,富人应该向穷人伸出援手。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Jan 21;341:123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Generalized Social Dilemmas: The Evolution of Cooperation in Populations with Variable Group Size.广义社会困境:变群组大小的群体中合作的演化。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Nov;81(11):4643-4674. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-00545-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
10
Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game.通过集体风险社会困境博弈中的自适应反馈进行共同进化动力学。
Elife. 2023 May 19;12:e82954. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82954.

引用本文的文献

1
Humans program artificial delegates to accurately solve collective-risk dilemmas but lack precision.人类设计人工代理来精确解决集体风险困境,但缺乏精确性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2319942121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319942121. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
A new electoral bottom-up model of institutional governance.一种新的自下而上的制度治理选举模式。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3865. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87322-y.
3
Co-evolution of risk and cooperation in climate policies under wealth inequality.财富不平等下气候政策中风险与合作的共同演化

本文引用的文献

1
Toward an experimental exploration of the complexity of human social interactions.迈向对人类社会互动复杂性的实验性探索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 8;108(45):18195-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116031108. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
2
Self-enforcing strategies to deter free-riding in the climate change mitigation game and other repeated public good games.自我实施策略以遏制气候变化缓解博弈和其他重复公共品博弈中的搭便车行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 20;108(38):15739-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106265108. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Dec 9;3(12):pgae550. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae550. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The art of compensation: How hybrid teams solve collective-risk dilemmas.补偿的艺术:混合团队如何解决集体风险困境。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0297213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297213. eCollection 2024.
5
Evolution of conditional cooperation in collective-risk social dilemma with repeated group interactions.具有重复群体相互作用的集体风险社会困境中条件合作的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 13;290(2006):20230949. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0949. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Cooperation dynamics under pandemic risks and heterogeneous economic interdependence.疫情风险与异质经济相互依存下的合作动态
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2022 Feb;155:111655. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111655. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
A collective risk dilemma for tourism restrictions under the COVID-19 context.在 COVID-19 背景下旅游限制的集体风险困境。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 3;11(1):5043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84604-z.
8
Timing Uncertainty in Collective Risk Dilemmas Encourages Group Reciprocation and Polarization.集体风险困境中的时间不确定性会促使群体互惠与两极分化。
iScience. 2020 Oct 31;23(12):101752. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101752. eCollection 2020 Dec 18.
9
Evolution of contribution timing in public goods games.公共物品博弈中贡献时机的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 May 27;287(1927):20200735. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0735.
10
Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse.关爱未来,可以将因崩溃风险而采取的长期集体行动从悲剧变为喜剧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 9;117(23):12915-12922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916545117. Epub 2020 May 20.
不平等、沟通与公共物品博弈中避免灾难性气候变化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 19;108(29):11825-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102493108. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
4
Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.综述:无分类一次性社会困境中的公共物品博弈论
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
5
Risk of collective failure provides an escape from the tragedy of the commons.集体失败的风险为摆脱公地悲剧提供了一条出路。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10421-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015648108. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
6
Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons.社会学习促进了对公共资源进行管理的制度的形成。
Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):861-3. doi: 10.1038/nature09203. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
7
Evolutionary games in the multiverse.多元宇宙中的进化博弈。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 23;107(12):5500-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912214107. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
8
Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.具有集体风险的阈值公共品博弈中社会合作的出现
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jul;80(1 Pt 2):016101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016101. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
9
Evolution of cooperation under N-person snowdrift games.多人雪堆游戏下的合作进化。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Oct 21;260(4):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of collective action in N-person stag hunt dilemmas.N人猎鹿困境中集体行动的进化动力学
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):315-21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1126.