Kotoh Kazuhiro, Fukushima Marie, Horikawa Yuki, Yamashita Shinsaku, Kohjima Motoyuki, Nakamuta Makoto, Enjoji Munechika
Department of Hepatology and Pancreatology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka;
Exp Ther Med. 2012 Jan;3(1):72-75. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.370. Epub 2011 Oct 9.
Residual hepatic functional reserve in cirrhotic patients is generally evaluated by a multivariate scoring system (Child-Pugh classification), which includes serum albumin levels as a variable. However, several patients show discrepancies between serum albumin levels and the progression of liver fibrosis, especially those with alcoholic cirrhosis. To assess whether hepatic capacity of protein synthesis varies with the etiology of cirrhosis, serum albumin and cholinesterase levels, and prothrombin time were compared between alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis. To minimize the influence of malnutrition and extrahepatic platelet destruction, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, uncontrolled diabetes, appetite loss and/or splenal longitudinal size >15 cm were excluded. The patients with compensated liver cirrhosis were divided into three groups as follows: alcohol(+)/HCV(+) (alcohol + HCV group; n=31), alcohol(-)/HCV(+) (HCV group; n=31) and alcohol(+)/HCV(-) (alcohol group; n=27). These groups were adjusted with respect to age, gender, body mass index and platelet count. Serum albumin levels in the alcohol group were significantly higher than those in the HCV group, with a difference of approximately 0.5 g/dl in every class of platelet count. The correlation of the alcohol + HCV group was intermediate between the alcohol and HCV groups. On the other hand, the correlations between serum cholinesterase levels and platelet counts were similar among the three groups. The prothrombin time was also comparable among the groups. Accordingly, serum albumin levels were higher in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and alcohol consumption should be carefully considered when evaluating hepatic functional reserve.
肝硬化患者的残余肝功能性储备通常通过多变量评分系统(Child-Pugh分级)进行评估,该系统将血清白蛋白水平作为一个变量。然而,一些患者的血清白蛋白水平与肝纤维化进展之间存在差异,尤其是酒精性肝硬化患者。为了评估肝硬化病因不同时肝脏蛋白质合成能力是否存在差异,对酒精性肝硬化和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)相关性肝硬化患者的血清白蛋白、胆碱酯酶水平及凝血酶原时间进行了比较。为尽量减少营养不良和肝外血小板破坏的影响,排除了患有肝细胞癌、未控制的糖尿病、食欲减退和/或脾长径>15 cm的患者。将代偿期肝硬化患者分为以下三组:酒精(+)/HCV(+)(酒精+HCV组;n = 31)、酒精(-)/HCV(+)(HCV组;n = 31)和酒精(+)/HCV(-)(酒精组;n = 27)。对这些组在年龄、性别、体重指数和血小板计数方面进行了调整。酒精组的血清白蛋白水平显著高于HCV组,在每一类血小板计数中差异约为0.5 g/dl。酒精+HCV组的相关性介于酒精组和HCV组之间。另一方面,三组血清胆碱酯酶水平与血小板计数之间的相关性相似。各组之间的凝血酶原时间也相当。因此,酒精性肝硬化患者的血清白蛋白水平较高,在评估肝功能储备时应仔细考虑酒精摄入情况。