Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115-5899, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):539-55. doi: 10.1002/sim.5630. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
The catalyst for this paper is the recent interest in the relationship between social networks and an individual's health, which has arisen following a series of papers by Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler on person- to-person spread of health behaviors. In this issue, they provide a detailed explanation of their methods that offers insights, justifications, and responses to criticisms. In this paper, we introduce some of the key statistical methods used in social network analysis and indicate where those used by Christakis and Fowler (CF) fit into the general framework. The intent is to provide the background necessary for readers to be able to make their own evaluation of the work by CF and understand the challenges of research involving social networks. We entertain possible solutions to some of the difficulties encountered in accounting for confounding effects in analyses of peer effects and provide comments on the contributions of CF.
这篇论文的催化剂是最近人们对社交网络与个人健康之间关系的兴趣,这是继 Nicholas Christakis 和 James Fowler 关于健康行为人际传播的一系列论文之后产生的。在本期中,他们详细解释了他们的方法,提供了见解、理由和对批评的回应。在本文中,我们介绍了社交网络分析中使用的一些关键统计方法,并指出了 Christakis 和 Fowler(CF)使用的方法在一般框架中的位置。我们的目的是为读者提供必要的背景知识,以便他们能够对 CF 的工作进行自己的评估,并了解涉及社交网络的研究的挑战。我们探讨了在分析同伴效应时解决混杂效应所遇到的一些困难的可能解决方案,并对 CF 的贡献发表了评论。