Suppr超能文献

回肠贮袋肛管吻合术与回肠造口术对溃疡性结肠炎患者生活质量的比较。

A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy.

机构信息

University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1131-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182690870.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is frequently considered the procedure of choice for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis, presumably owing to an expectation of improved quality of life in comparison with an ileostomy.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to determine whether long-term quality of life among patients with a pelvic pouch is better than those who chose a permanent stoma.

DESIGN

This investigation is a cross-sectional observational study using a prospective database.

SETTING

This study was conducted at an academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients who had undergone IPAA or a permanent ileostomy for ulcerative colitis by a single surgeon, presenting for their annual follow-up visit from July through September 2011, were offered participation in the study. A randomly chosen group of subjects who did not have scheduled appointments during the study period were sent a letter inviting them to participate in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures used were EQ-5D-3L, the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, and the Stoma Quality of Life scale.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a pelvic pouch and 24 ostomates were accrued and comprehensively studied. Global quality-of-life scores were virtually identical for the 2 groups. Patients with a pelvic pouch had better subscores in current quality of health and energy level, Fazio score, sexuality/body image, and work/social function.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its small sample size, and some of our patients were enrolled through mailed surveys and, hence, nonresponse bias may be present. The follow-up time since surgery was longer in the pelvic pouch group than in the ileostomy group.

CONCLUSION

Informed patients with ulcerative colitis choosing an ileostomy have a health-related global quality of life very similar to patients with a pelvic pouch. Better outcomes in patients with an ileal pouch were most evident in the areas of sexuality/body image and work/social function.

摘要

背景

全直肠结肠切除加回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)通常被认为是溃疡性结肠炎手术患者的首选术式,这可能是因为与回肠造口术相比,患者的生活质量预期会得到改善。

目的

我们的研究目的是确定接受直肠储袋术的患者的长期生活质量是否优于选择永久性肠造口术的患者。

设计

这是一项使用前瞻性数据库的横断面观察性研究。

地点

这项研究在一家学术医疗中心进行。

患者

2011 年 7 月至 9 月,由同一位外科医生为溃疡性结肠炎行 IPAA 或永久性回肠造口术的连续患者,在年度随访就诊时,受邀参加了这项研究。在研究期间没有预约的随机选择的一组患者收到了一封邀请他们参加研究的信。

主要观察指标

使用的主要结果测量指标是 EQ-5D-3L、简短的炎症性肠病生活质量问卷、克利夫兰全球生活质量量表、粪便失禁生活质量量表和造口生活质量量表。

结果

共纳入并全面研究了 35 例直肠储袋患者和 24 例造口患者。两组的全球生活质量评分几乎相同。直肠储袋患者在当前健康状况和精力、Fazio 评分、性/身体形象以及工作/社会功能方面的亚评分更好。

局限性

本研究受到样本量小的限制,我们的一些患者是通过邮寄调查招募的,因此可能存在无应答偏倚。直肠储袋组的手术随访时间长于回肠造口组。

结论

知情选择回肠造口术的溃疡性结肠炎患者的健康相关全球生活质量与直肠储袋患者非常相似。回肠储袋患者的结局更好,在性/身体形象和工作/社会功能方面最为明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验