Hogden Anne, Greenfield David, Nugus Peter, Kiernan Matthew C
Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:691-701. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S36759. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
The aim of this study was to explore clinician perspectives on patient decision-making in multidisciplinary care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), in an attempt to identify factors influencing decision-making.
Thirty-two health professionals from two specialized multidisciplinary ALS clinics participated in individual and group interviews. Participants came from allied health, medical, and nursing backgrounds. Interviews were audio recorded, and the transcripts were analyzed thematically.
Respondents identified barriers and facilitators to optimal timing and quality of decision-making. Barriers related to the patient and the health system. Patient barriers included difficulties accepting the diagnosis, information sources, and the patient-carer relationship. System barriers were timing of diagnosis and symptom management services, access to ALS-specific resources, and interprofessional communication. Facilitators were teamwork approaches, supported by effective communication and evidence-based information.
Patient-centered and collaborative decision-making is influenced by a range of factors that inhibit the delivery of optimal care. Decision-making relies on a fine balance between timing of information and service provision, and the readiness of patients to receive them. Health system restrictions impacted on optimal timing, and patients coming to terms with their condition. Clinicians valued proactive decision-making to prepare patients and families for inevitable change. The findings indicate disparity between patient choices and clinician perceptions of evidence, knowledge, and experience. To improve multidisciplinary ALS practice, and ultimately patient care, further work is required to bridge this gap in perspectives.
本研究旨在探讨临床医生对于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)多学科护理中患者决策的看法,以试图确定影响决策的因素。
来自两家专门的ALS多学科诊所的32名卫生专业人员参与了个人访谈和小组访谈。参与者来自联合健康、医学和护理背景。访谈进行了录音,并对文字记录进行了主题分析。
受访者确定了影响决策最佳时机和质量的障碍及促进因素。障碍与患者和卫生系统有关。患者方面的障碍包括难以接受诊断、信息来源以及患者与护理人员的关系。系统方面的障碍是诊断时间和症状管理服务、获取ALS特定资源以及跨专业沟通。促进因素是团队合作方法,辅以有效的沟通和循证信息。
以患者为中心的协作性决策受到一系列阻碍最佳护理提供的因素影响。决策依赖于信息和服务提供时间与患者接受意愿之间的微妙平衡。卫生系统的限制影响了最佳时机以及患者对自身病情的接受。临床医生重视积极主动的决策,以便让患者和家属为不可避免的变化做好准备。研究结果表明患者选择与临床医生对证据、知识和经验的认知之间存在差异。为改善ALS多学科实践并最终改善患者护理,需要进一步开展工作以弥合这种观点上的差距。