Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Pain Res. 2012;5:313-26. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S33925. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate predictive parameters of the acute pain score during induction of an inflammatory heat injury.
Healthy volunteers (50 females/50 males) were included in the study. The predictive potential of gender, anthropometric (body surface area, body mass index), psychological (anxiety, depression, vulnerability), and psychophysical (quantitative sensory testing, conditioned pain modulation) variables in estimating the pain response to a validated heat injury (47°C, 7 minutes, area 12.5 cm(2)) were investigated. All assessments were made in duplicate sessions separated by 21 days (median).
There were three main findings in this study. First, a predictive model of pain sensitivity during the heat injury, including both genders and using multiple regression technique, could account for 28% of the variance (P < 0.0001), but gender-related differences in the final model could not be demonstrated. Second, the results confirmed significant gender-related differences in perception of electrical, pressure, and cold pressor stimuli (P < 0.002). Third, positive correlations between anthropometric data and pain perception during electrical and pressure stimuli were demonstrated (P < 0.001 and P < 0.005, respectively).
The study demonstrated predictability of acute pain sensitivity, and although gender-related differences in pain perception were demonstrated, no gender-related differences in pain sensitivity could be shown. Interestingly, positive correlations between anthropometric data and pain perception were shown for the first time.
本研究的主要目的是评估诱导炎症性热损伤时急性疼痛评分的预测参数。
本研究纳入了健康志愿者(女性 50 名,男性 50 名)。研究了性别、人体测量学(体表面积、体重指数)、心理(焦虑、抑郁、脆弱性)和心理物理学(定量感觉测试、条件疼痛调制)变量在预测对验证性热损伤(47°C,7 分钟,面积 12.5 cm²)的疼痛反应中的预测潜力。所有评估均在 21 天(中位数)的两次重复会话中进行。
本研究有三个主要发现。首先,一个包含两性并使用多元回归技术的热损伤期间疼痛敏感性预测模型,可以解释 28%的方差(P<0.0001),但最终模型中不能证明性别相关差异。其次,结果证实了电、压力和冷加压刺激的感知存在显著的性别相关差异(P<0.002)。第三,证明了人体测量数据与电和压力刺激期间疼痛感知之间存在正相关(P<0.001 和 P<0.005,分别)。
该研究证明了急性疼痛敏感性的可预测性,尽管显示了疼痛感知的性别相关差异,但不能证明疼痛敏感性的性别相关差异。有趣的是,首次显示了人体测量数据与疼痛感知之间的正相关。