• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国哮喘患者疾病管理计划:一项基于人群的纵向研究。

Disease management programs for patients with asthma in Germany: a longitudinal population-based study.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Orleansstraße 47, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2013 Jul;58(7):1170-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01968.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.01968
PMID:23106942
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of the disease management program (DMP) for patients with asthma is to improve health outcomes and to reduce costs. Five years after its introduction in Germany, no consensus has yet been reached as to whether DMP has been effective in reaching these goals.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the DMP for asthma in Bavaria using routinely collected subject medical records.

METHODS

A longitudinal population-based study encompassing over 100,000 DMP participants between 2006 (when the program began) and 2010.

RESULTS

The prescription rate of oral corticosteroids dropped from 15.7% in 2006 to 13.6% in 2007, and again from 7.5% in 2008 to 5.9% in 2010 (P < .001). The proportion of subjects with asthma self-management education increased from 4.4% to 23.4% (P < .001). Utilization of an individual asthma action plan increased from 40.3% to 69.3% (P < .001). Hospitalization decreased from 2.8% to 0.7% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first 4 years of DMP there was an improvement in pharmacotherapy and patient self management. The proportion of subjects requiring hospitalization decreased. Our results suggest that the German DMP for asthma has been effective in enhancing the quality of care in regard to an improved symptom frequency, adherence to guidelines, pharmacotherapy, and hospitalization.

摘要

背景

哮喘疾病管理计划(DMP)的主要目标是改善健康结果并降低成本。在德国推出该计划五年后,对于其是否已达到这些目标仍未达成共识。

目的

使用常规收集的患者病历评估巴伐利亚的哮喘 DMP。

方法

一项包含 2006 年(计划开始时)至 2010 年超过 100,000 名 DMP 参与者的纵向基于人群的研究。

结果

口服皮质类固醇的处方率从 2006 年的 15.7%降至 2007 年的 13.6%,并从 2008 年的 7.5%再次降至 2010 年的 5.9%(P <.001)。接受哮喘自我管理教育的患者比例从 4.4%增加到 23.4%(P <.001)。个人哮喘行动计划的使用率从 40.3%增加到 69.3%(P <.001)。住院率从 2.8%降至 0.7%(P <.001)。

结论

在 DMP 的前 4 年中,药物治疗和患者自我管理得到了改善。需要住院治疗的患者比例下降。我们的结果表明,德国的哮喘 DMP 有效地提高了护理质量,改善了症状频率、对指南的依从性、药物治疗和住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Disease management programs for patients with asthma in Germany: a longitudinal population-based study.德国哮喘患者疾病管理计划:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
Respir Care. 2013 Jul;58(7):1170-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01968.
2
Disease management programs for patients with COPD in Germany: a longitudinal evaluation of routinely collected patient records.德国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病管理项目:对常规收集的患者记录的纵向评估。
Respir Care. 2014 Jul;59(7):1123-32. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02748. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Effectiveness of asthma education with and without a self-management plan in hospitalized children.有或没有自我管理计划的哮喘教育对住院儿童的有效性。
J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):906-10. doi: 10.3109/02770900903199979.
4
Use of asthma guidelines by primary care providers to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits in poor, minority, urban children.初级保健提供者使用哮喘指南以减少贫困、少数族裔城市儿童的住院率和急诊就诊率。
J Pediatr. 2005 May;146(5):591-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.017.
5
[Evaluating the effectiveness of a disease management program diabetes in the German Statutory Health Insurance: first results and methodological considerations].[评估德国法定医疗保险中糖尿病疾病管理项目的有效性:初步结果与方法学考量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
[Disease-related self-management of obese children and children with bronchial asthma: changes and predictors during inpatient rehabilitation].[肥胖儿童和支气管哮喘儿童的疾病相关自我管理:住院康复期间的变化及预测因素]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2011 Dec;50(6):397-407. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291278. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
A randomized, controlled study to evaluate the role of an in-home asthma disease management program provided by respiratory therapists in improving outcomes and reducing the cost of care.一项随机对照研究,旨在评估呼吸治疗师提供的家庭哮喘疾病管理项目在改善治疗效果和降低护理成本方面的作用。
J Asthma. 2009 Mar;46(2):194-201. doi: 10.1080/02770900802610068.
8
ELSID-Diabetes study-evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Rationale, design and conduct--a study protocol [ISRCTN08471887].ELSID-糖尿病研究——对2型糖尿病患者疾病管理项目大规模实施情况的评估。原理、设计与实施——一项研究方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN08471887]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 4;5:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-99.
9
Disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a longitudinal population-based descriptive study.德国2型糖尿病患者的疾病管理项目:一项基于人群的纵向描述性研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 May 18;9:37. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0236-y. eCollection 2017.
10
Asthma management practices in adults--findings from the German Health Update (GEDA) 2010 and the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey (DEGS1) 2008-2011.成人哮喘管理实践——来自2010年德国健康更新调查(GEDA)和2008 - 2011年德国国民健康访谈与检查调查(DEGS1)的结果
J Asthma. 2016;53(1):50-61. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1059853. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing the Patient Needs in Asthma Treatment (NEAT) questionnaire in routine care: a qualitative study among patients and health professionals.在常规护理中实施哮喘治疗患者需求(NEAT)问卷:患者和卫生专业人员的定性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02293-4.
2
Effectiveness of an online education program for asthma patients in general practice: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对普通实践中哮喘患者的在线教育计划的有效性:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02217-2.
3
ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.
ERS/EAACI 关于遵守国际成人哮喘指南的声明。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Sep 15;30(161). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0132-2021. Print 2021 Sep 30.
4
Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?改善哮喘的初级保健管理:我们真的知道什么有效吗?
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Jun 17;30(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0184-0.
5
A Fourth Trimester Action Plan for Wellness.第四孕期健康行动计划。
J Perinat Educ. 2020 Apr 1;29(2):103-112. doi: 10.1891/J-PE-D-18-00034.
6
An Internet-Based Asthma Self-Management Program Increases Knowledge About Asthma.基于互联网的哮喘自我管理计划可增加哮喘知识。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(5):64-71. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0064.
7
Participation factors for asthma education programs - a cross sectional survey.哮喘教育计划的参与因素——一项横断面调查。
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0979-3.
8
Physician perspectives on the burden and management of asthma in six countries: The Global Asthma Physician Survey (GAPS).医生视角下六个国家的哮喘负担和管理情况:全球哮喘医生调查(GAPS)。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0492-5.
9
The evaluation of a remote support program on quality of life and evolution of disease in COPD patients with frequent exacerbations.对频繁急性加重的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的生活质量及疾病进展的远程支持项目评估。
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0304-3.
10
Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.将非随机研究纳入Cochrane综述可为医疗保健利益相关者带来补充信息:增强的系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1816-5.