• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 至 8 岁儿童在两项物体操作任务中的终末状态舒适效应。

The end-state comfort effect in 3- to 8-year-old children in two object manipulation tasks.

机构信息

Developmental Psychology Unit, Saarland University Saarbrücken, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 29;3:445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00445. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00445
PMID:23112786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482869/
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare 3- to 8-year-old children's propensity to anticipate a comfortable hand posture at the end of a grasping movement (end-state comfort effect) between two different object manipulation tasks, the bar-transport task, and the overturned-glass task. In the bar-transport task, participants were asked to insert a vertically positioned bar into a small opening of a box. In the overturned-glass task, participants were asked to put an overturned-glass right-side-up on a coaster. Half of the participants experienced action effects (lights) as a consequence of their movements (AE groups), while the other half of the participants did not (No-AE groups). While there was no difference between the AE and No-AE groups, end-state comfort performance differed across age as well as between tasks. Results revealed a significant increase in end-state comfort performance in the bar-transport task from 13% in the 3-year-olds to 94% in the 8-year-olds. Interestingly, the number of children grasping the bar according to end-state comfort doubled from 3 to 4 years and from 4 to 5 years of age. In the overturned-glass task an increase in end-state comfort performance from already 63% in the 3-year-olds to 100% in the 8-year-olds was significant as well. When comparing end-state comfort performance across tasks, results showed that 3- and 4-year-old children were better at manipulating the glass as compared to manipulating the bar, most probably, because children are more familiar with manipulating glasses. Together, these results suggest that preschool years are an important period for the development of motor planning in which the familiarity with the object involved in the task plays a significant role in children's ability to plan their movements according to end-state comfort.

摘要

本研究旨在比较 3-8 岁儿童在两种不同的物体操作任务(棒传输任务和翻倒玻璃杯任务)中对抓握动作结束时舒适手姿的预期倾向(结束状态舒适效应)。在棒传输任务中,参与者被要求将垂直放置的棒插入盒子的小开口中。在翻倒玻璃杯任务中,参与者被要求将翻倒的玻璃杯正放在杯垫上。一半的参与者体验到动作效果(灯光)作为其动作的后果(AE 组),而另一半参与者则没有(无 AE 组)。虽然 AE 组和无 AE 组之间没有差异,但结束状态舒适表现因年龄和任务而异。结果表明,在棒传输任务中,结束状态舒适表现从 3 岁儿童的 13%显著增加到 8 岁儿童的 94%。有趣的是,根据结束状态舒适抓握棒的儿童数量从 3 岁到 4 岁增加了一倍,从 4 岁到 5 岁也增加了一倍。在翻倒玻璃杯任务中,结束状态舒适表现从 3 岁儿童的 63%显著增加到 8 岁儿童的 100%。当比较跨任务的结束状态舒适表现时,结果表明 3 岁和 4 岁的儿童在操纵玻璃杯方面比操纵棒更好,这很可能是因为儿童更熟悉操纵玻璃杯。总的来说,这些结果表明,学前阶段是运动规划发展的重要时期,在此期间,儿童对任务中涉及的物体的熟悉程度在他们根据结束状态舒适来规划动作的能力中起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/0de69187e48c/fpsyg-03-00445-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/c613dc1d246d/fpsyg-03-00445-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/4ae1419407ac/fpsyg-03-00445-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/0de69187e48c/fpsyg-03-00445-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/c613dc1d246d/fpsyg-03-00445-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/4ae1419407ac/fpsyg-03-00445-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f03f/3482869/0de69187e48c/fpsyg-03-00445-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The end-state comfort effect in 3- to 8-year-old children in two object manipulation tasks.3 至 8 岁儿童在两项物体操作任务中的终末状态舒适效应。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 29;3:445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00445. eCollection 2012.
2
Developing motor planning over ages.发展运动规划的年龄阶段。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):116-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
3
End-state comfort in two object manipulation tasks: Investigating how the movement context influences planning in children, young adults, and older adults.两种物体操纵任务中的最终状态舒适度:探究运动背景如何影响儿童、年轻人和老年人的规划。
Dev Psychobiol. 2018 Apr;60(3):317-323. doi: 10.1002/dev.21611. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
Preschool children adapt grasping movements to upcoming object manipulations: Evidence from a dial rotation task.学龄前儿童会根据即将进行的物体操作调整抓握动作:来自转盘旋转任务的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.多种规划约束对6至10岁儿童抓握姿势规划发展的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Sep;51(9):1254-61. doi: 10.1037/a0039506. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
Anticipatory Planning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Assessment of Independent and Joint Action Tasks.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的前瞻性规划:独立行动任务与联合行动任务的评估
Front Integr Neurosci. 2016 Aug 23;10:29. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2016.00029. eCollection 2016.
7
Limits of end-state planning.终态规划的局限性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:148-62. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
The development of end- and beginning-state comfort in a cup manipulation task.在杯子操作任务中发展结束状态和起始状态的舒适感。
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Apr;56(3):407-20. doi: 10.1002/dev.21108. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.作为衡量儿童有效动作规划指标的抓握高度效应的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;153:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
The influence of action execution on end-state comfort and underlying movement kinematics: An examination of right and left handed participants.动作执行对最终状态舒适度及潜在运动运动学的影响:对右利手和左利手参与者的研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic object detection for behavioural research using YOLOv8.使用 YOLOv8 进行行为研究的自动目标检测。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7307-7330. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02420-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Movement Matters! Understanding the Developmental Trajectory of Embodied Planning.运动至关重要!理解具身规划的发展轨迹。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:633100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633100. eCollection 2021.
3
The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.物体大小对翻转杯子任务中二阶规划的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
How learning to shake a rattle affects 8-month-old infants' perception of the rattle's sound: electrophysiological evidence for action-effect binding in infancy.学习摇响拨浪鼓如何影响 8 个月大婴儿对拨浪鼓声音的感知:婴儿动作-效果绑定的电生理证据。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 May 27.
2
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.认知、动作和物体操控。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):924-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027839. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
3
Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01509-2. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
4
Eliciting End-State Comfort Planning in Children With and Without Developmental Coordination Disorder Using a Hammer Task: A Pilot Study.使用锤子任务在有和没有发育性协调障碍的儿童中引出终态舒适规划:一项初步研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:625577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625577. eCollection 2021.
5
Efficiency in Rule- vs. Plan-Based Movements Is Modulated by Action-Mode.基于规则与基于计划的运动效率受行动模式调节。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 13;9:309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00309. eCollection 2018.
6
Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs.抓握动作的神经生理学:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 22;7:1996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01996. eCollection 2016.
7
The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.工具使用的发展:为最终状态的舒适而规划。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;52(11):1878-1892. doi: 10.1037/dev0000207.
8
Anticipatory Planning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Assessment of Independent and Joint Action Tasks.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的前瞻性规划:独立行动任务与联合行动任务的评估
Front Integr Neurosci. 2016 Aug 23;10:29. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2016.00029. eCollection 2016.
9
No Interrelation of Motor Planning and Executive Functions across Young Ages.不同年龄段儿童的运动计划与执行功能之间不存在相互关系。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 12;7:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01031. eCollection 2016.
10
A Three-Stage Model for the Acquisition of Anticipatory Planning Skills for Grip Selection during Object Manipulation in Young Children.幼儿在物体操作过程中抓握选择预期计划技能习得的三阶段模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 5;7:958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00958. eCollection 2016.
儿童抓握姿势和预期运动规划的表现。
Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):768-76. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0387-7. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
4
Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.(日常)物体操作中的习惯性和目标导向因素。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;213(4):371-82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2787-8. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
5
Where do action goals come from? Evidence for spontaneous action-effect binding in infants.行动目标从何而来?婴儿自发的行动-效果联结的证据。
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 23;1:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00201. eCollection 2010.
6
Bridging the gap between the other and me: the functional role of motor resonance and action effects in infants' imitation.弥合“我”与“他者”之间的差距:运动共鸣和动作效应对婴儿模仿的功能作用。
Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):901-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01040.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
7
Learning to grasp efficiently: the development of motor planning and the role of observational learning.学习高效抓握:运动规划的发展及观察学习的作用。
Vision Res. 2011 Apr 22;51(8):945-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
8
Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.自主运动效应预期的自适应控制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Nov;135(3):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
9
Action planning in typically and atypically developing children (unilateral cerebral palsy).典型和非典型发育儿童(单侧脑瘫)的动作规划。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;31(5):1039-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 6.
10
The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children.学龄前儿童临终舒适护理计划的制定。
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(6):476-782. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000059.