Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;73(10):1342-50. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07674.
To examine the proposed disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) diagnosis in a child psychiatric outpatient population. Evaluation of DMDD included 4 domains: clinical phenomenology, delimitation from other diagnoses, longitudinal stability, and association with parental psychiatric disorders.
Data were obtained from 706 children aged 6-12 years who participated in the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) study (sample was accrued from November 2005 to November 2008). DSM-IV criteria were used, and assessments, which included diagnostic, symptomatic, and functional measures, were performed at intake and at 12 and 24 months of follow-up. For the current post hoc analyses, a retrospective diagnosis of DMDD was constructed using items from the K-SADS-PL-W, a version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children, which resulted in criteria closely matching the proposed DSM-5 criteria for DMDD.
At intake, 26% of participants met the operational DMDD criteria. DMDD+ vs DMDD- participants had higher rates of oppositional defiant disorder (relative risk [RR] = 3.9, P < .0001) and conduct disorder (RR = 4.5, P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, DMDD+ participants had higher rates of and more severe symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder (rate and symptom severity P values < .0001) and conduct disorder (rate, P < .0001; symptom severity, P = .01), but did not differ in the rates of mood, anxiety, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders or in severity of inattentive, hyperactive, manic, depressive, or anxiety symptoms. Most of the participants with oppositional defiant disorder (58%) or conduct disorder (61%) met DMDD criteria, but those who were DMDD+ vs DMDD- did not differ in diagnostic comorbidity, symptom severity, or functional impairment. Over 2-year follow-up, 40% of the LAMS sample met DMDD criteria at least once, but 52% of these participants met criteria at only 1 assessment. DMDD was not associated with new onset of mood or anxiety disorders or with parental psychiatric history.
In this clinical sample, DMDD could not be delimited from oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, had limited diagnostic stability, and was not associated with current, future-onset, or parental history of mood or anxiety disorders. These findings raise concerns about the diagnostic utility of DMDD in clinical populations.
在儿童精神科门诊人群中检查拟议的破坏性心境失调障碍(DMDD)诊断。DMDD 的评估包括 4 个领域:临床表型、与其他诊断的界限、纵向稳定性以及与父母精神障碍的关联。
本研究的数据来自于 706 名年龄在 6-12 岁之间的儿童,他们参加了纵向评估躁狂症状(LAMS)研究(样本于 2005 年 11 月至 2008 年 11 月期间入组)。使用 DSM-IV 标准,在入组时以及 12 个月和 24 个月的随访时进行诊断、症状和功能评估。目前的事后分析使用 K-SADS-PL-W(儿童期情感障碍和精神分裂症的时间表)的项目构建回顾性 DMDD 诊断,该时间表的一个版本,导致的标准与 DMDD 的 DSM-5 标准非常匹配。
在入组时,26%的参与者符合操作性 DMDD 标准。DMDD+与 DMDD-参与者的对立违抗性障碍(相对风险 [RR] = 3.9,P<.0001)和品行障碍(RR = 4.5,P<.0001)发生率更高。在多变量分析中,DMDD+参与者的对立违抗性障碍(发生率和症状严重程度 P 值均<.0001)和品行障碍(发生率,P<.0001;症状严重程度,P=.01)的发生率更高,症状更严重,但情绪、焦虑或注意力缺陷/多动障碍的发生率或注意力不集中、过度活跃、躁狂、抑郁或焦虑症状的严重程度没有差异。大多数对立违抗性障碍(58%)或品行障碍(61%)患者符合 DMDD 标准,但 DMDD+与 DMDD-患者在诊断共病、症状严重程度或功能障碍方面没有差异。在 2 年的随访中,LAMS 样本中有 40%至少有一次符合 DMDD 标准,但其中 52%仅在 1 次评估中符合标准。DMDD 与新发心境或焦虑障碍或父母精神病史无关。
在这个临床样本中,DMDD 不能与对立违抗性障碍和品行障碍区分开来,诊断稳定性有限,且与当前、未来发作或父母心境或焦虑障碍史无关。这些发现引发了对 DMDD 在临床人群中的诊断效用的关注。